Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103739›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020

Evaluation of posterior capsule opacification of the Alcon Clareon IOL vs the Alcon Acrysof IOL using a human capsular bag model.

Anna Hillenmayer, Christian M Wertheimer, Stefan Kassumeh, Annabel von Studnitz, Nikolaus Luft, Andreas Ohlmann, Siegfried Priglinger, Wolfgang J Mayer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna HillenmayerCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Christian M WertheimerCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Stefan KassumehCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Annabel von StudnitzCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Nikolaus LuftCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Andreas OhlmannCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Siegfried PriglingerCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang J MayerCell and molecular biology research laboratory, Division of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336, Munich, Germany. wolfgang.j.mayer@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8891-4875
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Alcon IIT # 25962225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior capsule opacification (PCO) after cataract surgery is influenced by intraocular lens (IOL) design and material. The following is an ex vivo comparison of PCO between the Clareon vs. the AcrySof IOL in human capsular bags.

methodsTwenty cadaver capsular bags from 10 human donors were used, with the novel hydrophobic IOL (Clareon, CNA0T0) being implanted in one eye and the other eye of the same donor receiving the AcrySof IOL (SN60WF) following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Five capsular bags of 3 donors served as controls without IOL. Cellular growth of lens epithelial cells was photo-documented daily. The primary endpoint was the time until full coverage of the posterior capsule by cells. Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining of capsular bags for the fibrotic markers f-actin, fibronectin, alpha smooth muscle actin, and collagen type 1 were performed.

resultsThe new Clareon IOL did not show any disadvantages in terms of days until full cell coverage of the posterior capsule in comparison to the AcrySof (p > 0.99). Both, the Clareon (p = 0.01, 14.8 days) and the AcrySof IOL (p = 0.005, 15.7 days) showed a slower PCO development in comparison to the control (8.6 days). The fibrotic markers f-actin, fibronectin, alpha smooth muscle actin, and collagen type 1 were equally distributed between the two IOLs and differed from the control.

conclusionsA comparable performance has been found in the ex vivo formation of PCO between the two IOLs. Long-term clinical studies are necessary to reach final conclusions.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationActinsAgedCapsule OpacificationCells, CulturedCollagen Type IFibronectinsFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansMiddle AgedPosterior Capsule of the LensProsthesis DesignTissue DonorsVisual AcuityACTA2 protein, humanActinsCollagen Type IFibronectinsFN1 protein, humanAcrySofCapsular bag modelCataract surgeryClareonPosterior capsule opacification

Identifiers

PMID32103739
PMCPMC7045627
OpenAlexW3012733011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.