Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103724›Full record

Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2020

Predictive value of random blood glucose versus fasting blood glucose on in-hospital adverse events in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Yuhan Qin, Gaoliang Yan, Yong Qiao, Dong Wang, Erfei Luo, Jiantong Hou, Chengchun Tang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhan QinMedical school of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Gaoliang YanDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Yong QiaoDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Dong WangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Erfei LuoMedical school of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Jiantong HouMedical school of Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China.
Chengchun TangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, People's Republic of China. tangchengchun@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3767-3551
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CNSoutheast University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81600227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aim to find out the relationship between random blood glucose (RBG), fasting blood glucose (FBG) and in-hospital adverse events in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. We evaluate and compare the predictive value of RBG and FBG on in-hospital adverse events, and give an appropriate cut-off value of RBG and FBG.

methodA retrospective study enrolled 958 consecutive AMI patients undergoing emergency coronary angiography at Zhongda Hospital were enrolled from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018 was performed. RBG and FBG, baseline data and adverse events were recorded. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were defined as death, nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction and stroke. Other adverse events included malignant arrhythmia, cardiac shock and hemorrhage. Patients with RBG > 11.1 mmol/L were divided into elevated RBG group. Patients with FBG > 6.1 mmol/L were divided into elevated FBG group. The incidence of in-hospital adverse events were compared in elevated RBG/FBG group and the control group. ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of RBG and FBG on in-hospital adverse events.

resultThe incidence of death, hemorrhage, cardiac shock and malignant arrhythmia significantly increases in elevated RBG and FBG group. Binary logistic regression showed that age, hypertension, diabetes, FBG and RBG were independent risk factors for in-hospital adverse events in STEMI patients. The AUC and 95% CI of RBG and FBG in predicting death of AMI patients were 0.789, 0.759~0.816; 0.810, 0.783~0.835, respectively. The cut-off values ​were 13.82 and 7.35 mmol/L. RBG and FBG also had fine predictive value on cardiac shock and malignant arrhythmia, no statistical difference was found in the predictive value on in-hospital adverse events (P = 0.462, P = 0.570, P = 0.694).

conclusionIncidence of in-hospital adverse events significantly increases in AMI patients combined with elevated RBG or FBG. Both RBG and FBG were independent risk factors for in-hospital adverse events, they had good value on predicting in-hospital adverse events and there was no statistical difference in their predictive value.

Indexed as

Patient AdmissionAgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseChinaCoronary AngiographyFastingFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkersBlood GlucoseAdverse eventsFBGPrognosisRBGSTEMI

Identifiers

PMID32103724
PMCPMC7045631
OpenAlexW3012602262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.