Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103517›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2020

Community Influences on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Comparison of Four Francophone West African Countries.

Sarah R Hayford, Sarah Garver, Abdramane B Soura, Yuk Fai Cheong, Rose Grace Grose, Kathryn M Yount

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdramane B SouraORCID 0000-0002-1539-6357
Yuk Fai Cheong

Funding

Institute for Population ResearchP2CHD058484 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
Community Influences on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in AfricaR21HD086762 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R, YOUNT, KATHRYN M · 2016 to 2017
$438k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development P2C-HD058484Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development R21-HD086762NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058484NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD086762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite long-term efforts to encourage abandonment of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGMC), the practice remains widespread globally. FGMC is situated in specific social and historical contexts, and both prevalence and rates of decline vary widely across practicing countries. However, cross-national comparative research on the determinants of FGMC is sparse. This paper adds to the limited body of rigorous, theoretically grounded quantitative studies of FGMC and takes a step toward advancing cross-national comparative research. We apply an integrated theoretical framework that brings together norms-based and gender-based explanations of community-level influences on FGMC. We test this framework in four francophone West African countries, drawing on comparable nationally representative data from the Demographic and Health Surveys in Burkina Faso (2010), Côte d'Ivoire (2011-2012), Guinea (2012), and Mali (2012-2013). Results show that community-level FGMC norms and community-level gendered opportunities are associated with girls' risk of FGMC, but that the direct and moderating associations vary qualitatively across countries. Our findings highlight the contribution of context-specific social and institutional processes to the decline or persistence of FGMC.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonCultural CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAfrica, WesternChildChild, PreschoolCircumcision, FemaleFemaleGender EquityGender IdentityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedMothers

Identifiers

PMID32103517
PMCPMC12703717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.