Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103465›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2020

Longform recordings of everyday life: Ethics for best practices.

Margaret Cychosz, Rachel Romeo, Melanie Soderstrom, Camila Scaff, Hillary Ganek, Alejandrina Cristia, Marisa Casillas, Kaya de Barbaro, Janet Y Bang, Adriana Weisleder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The use of Language ENvironment Analysis in autism research: A systematic review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Margaret CychoszDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, 1203 Dwinelle Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. mcychosz@berkeley.edu.
Rachel RomeoBoston Children's Hospital and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA.
Melanie SoderstromDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Camila ScaffHuman Ecology Group, Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hillary GanekThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alejandrina CristiaLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Psycholinguistique, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, Paris, France.
Marisa CasillasMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kaya de BarbaroDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Janet Y BangDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Adriana WeislederDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Dr., Frances Searle Building, Room 3-358, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. adriana.weisleder@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Translational Post-doctoral Training in NeurodevelopmentT32MH112510 · NIMH · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAVID C GLAHN, CHARLES Alexander NELSON · 2017 to 2026
$2.6M
High-density markers of mother-infant bio-behavioral activity "in the wild": Developing a mobile-sensing paradigm to examine transmission of mental health risksK01MH111957 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DE BARBARO, KAYA · 2017 to 2021
$473k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH111957NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in large-scale data storage and processing offer unprecedented opportunities for behavioral scientists to collect and analyze naturalistic data, including from underrepresented groups. Audio data, particularly real-world audio recordings, are of particular interest to behavioral scientists because they provide high-fidelity access to subtle aspects of daily life and social interactions. However, these methodological advances pose novel risks to research participants and communities. In this article, we outline the benefits and challenges associated with collecting, analyzing, and sharing multi-hour audio recording data. Guided by the principles of autonomy, privacy, beneficence, and justice, we propose a set of ethical guidelines for the use of longform audio recordings in behavioral research. This article is also accompanied by an Open Science Framework Ethics Repository that includes informed consent resources such as frequent participant concerns and sample consent forms.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityPrivacyVideo RecordingBehavioral ResearchData CollectionEthics, ResearchHumansInformed ConsentConfidentialityData managementEthicsLongform recordingNaturalisticPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID32103465
PMCPMC7483614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.