Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103259›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020

Tissue specific regulation of transcription in endometrium and association with disease.

Sally Mortlock, Raden I Kendarsari, Jenny N Fung, Greg Gibson, Fei Yang, Restuadi Restuadi, Jane E Girling, Sarah J Holdsworth-Carson, Wan Tinn Teh, Samuel W Lukowski and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Sally MortlockThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Raden I KendarsariThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jenny N FungThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Greg GibsonSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Fei YangThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Restuadi RestuadiThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jane E GirlingDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sarah J Holdsworth-CarsonUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Gynaecology Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia.
Wan Tinn TehUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Gynaecology Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia.
Samuel W LukowskiThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Martin HealeyUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Gynaecology Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia.
Ting QiThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Peter A W RogersUniversity of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Gynaecology Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia.
Jian YangThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Brett McKinnonThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Grant W MontgomeryThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionAre genetic effects on endometrial gene expression tissue specific and/or associated with reproductive traits and diseases? SUMMARY ANSWER: Analyses of RNA-sequence data and individual genotype data from the endometrium identified novel and disease associated, genetic mechanisms regulating gene expression in the endometrium and showed evidence that these mechanisms are shared across biologically similar tissues. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The endometrium is a complex tissue vital for female reproduction and is a hypothesized source of cells initiating endometriosis. Understanding genetic regulation specific to, and shared between, tissue types can aid the identification of genes involved in complex genetic diseases. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: RNA-sequence and genotype data from 206 individuals was analysed and results were compared with large publicly available datasets. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsRNA-sequencing and genotype data from 206 endometrial samples was used to identify the influence of genetic variants on gene expression, via expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis and to compare these endometrial eQTLs with those in other tissues. To investigate the association between endometrial gene expression regulation and reproductive traits and diseases, we conducted a tissue enrichment analysis, transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) and summary data-based Mendelian randomisation (SMR) analyses. Transcriptomic data was used to test differential gene expression between women with and without endometriosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A tissue enrichment analysis with endometriosis genome-wide association study summary statistics showed that genes surrounding endometriosis risk loci were significantly enriched in reproductive tissues. A total of 444 sentinel cis-eQTLs (P < 2.57 × 10-9) and 30 trans-eQTLs (P < 4.65 × 10-13) were detected, including 327 novel cis-eQTLs in endometrium. A large proportion (85%) of endometrial eQTLs are present in other tissues. Genetic effects on endometrial gene expression were highly correlated with the genetic effects on reproductive (e.g. uterus, ovary) and digestive tissues (e.g. salivary gland, stomach), supporting a shared genetic regulation of gene expression in biologically similar tissues. The TWAS analysis indicated that gene expression at 39 loci is associated with endometriosis, including five known endometriosis risk loci. SMR analyses identified potential target genes pleiotropically or causally associated with reproductive traits and diseases including endometriosis. However, without taking account of genetic variants, a direct comparison between women with and without endometriosis showed no significant difference in endometrial gene expression. LARGE SCALE DATA: The eQTL dataset generated in this study is available at http://reproductivegenomics.com.au/shiny/endo_eqtl_rna/. Additional datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and the supplementary information files, or are available on reasonable request. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data are derived from fresh tissue samples and expression levels are an average of expression from different cell types within the endometrium. Subtle cell-specifc expression changes may not be detected and differences in cell composition between samples and across the menstrual cycle will contribute to sample variability. Power to detect tissue specific eQTLs and differences between women with and without endometriosis was limited by the sample size in this study. The statistical approaches used in this study identify the likely gene targets for specific genetic risk factors, but not the functional mechanism by which changes in gene expression may influence disease risk. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOur results identify novel genetic variants that regulate gene expression in endometrium and the majority of these are shared across tissues. This allows analysis with large publicly available datasets to identify targets for female reproductive traits and diseases. Much larger studies will be required to identify genetic regulation of gene expression that will be specific to endometrium. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) under project grants GNT1026033, GNT1049472, GNT1046880, GNT1050208, GNT1105321, GNT1083405 and GNT1107258. G.W.M is supported by a NHMRC Fellowship (GNT1078399). J.Y is supported by an ARC Fellowship (FT180100186). There are no competing interests.

Indexed as

EndometriosisGenome-Wide Association StudyEndometriumFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleQuantitative Trait Lociendometriosisendometriumexpression quantitative trait loci (eQTL)gene expressiongenetic regulationRNA-sequencingtissue specific

Identifiers

PMID32103259
PMCPMC7048713
OpenAlexW3006959788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.