Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103098›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Effects of repetitive gentle handling of male C57BL/6NCrl mice on comparative behavioural test results.

Hiroshi Ueno, Yu Takahashi, Shunsuke Suemitsu, Shinji Murakami, Naoya Kitamura, Kenta Wani, Yosuke Matsumoto, Motoi Okamoto, Takeshi Ishihara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pilot Study of the Long-Term Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure on the Mouse Brain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi UenoDepartment of Medical Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Okayama, 701-0193, Japan. dhe422007@s.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Yu TakahashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Shunsuke SuemitsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Shinji MurakamiDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Naoya KitamuraDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Kenta WaniDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Yosuke MatsumotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Motoi OkamotoDepartment of Medical Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Takeshi IshiharaDepartment of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, 701-0192, Japan.
Kawasaki Medical School · JPOkayama University · JPKawasaki University of Medical Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice are the most commonly used laboratory animals for studying diseases, behaviour, and pharmacology. Behavioural experiment battery aids in evaluating abnormal behaviour in mice. During behavioural experiments, mice frequently experience human contact. However, the effects of repeated handling on mice behaviour remains unclear. To minimise mice stress, methods of moving mice using transparent tunnels or cups have been recommended but are impractical in behavioural tests. To investigate these effects, we used a behavioural test battery to assess differences between mice accustomed to the experimenter's handling versus control mice. Repeatedly handled mice gained slightly more weight than control mice. In behavioural tests, repeatedly handled mice showed improved spatial cognition in the Y-maze test and reduced anxiety-like behaviour in the elevated plus-maze test. However, there was no change in anxiety-like behaviour in the light/dark transition test or open-field test. Grip strength, rotarod, sociability, tail suspension, Porsolt forced swim, and passive avoidance tests revealed no significant differences between repeatedly handled and control mice. Our findings demonstrated that mice repeatedly handled by the experimenter before behavioural tests showed reduced anxiety about high altitudes and improved spatial cognition, suggesting that repeated contact can affect the results of some behavioural tests.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryAnxietyHandling, PsychologicalMaleMaze LearningMemoryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle Strength

Identifiers

PMID32103098
PMCPMC7044437
OpenAlexW3006731155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.