Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103093›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Glycosaminoglycan Domain Mapping of Cellular Chondroitin/Dermatan Sulfates.

Andrea Persson, Egor Vorontsov, Göran Larson, Jonas Nilsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea PerssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Egor VorontsovProteomics Core Facility, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Göran LarsonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jonas NilssonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. jonas.nilsson@clinchem.gu.se.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are polysaccharides produced by most mammalian cells and involved in a variety of biological processes. However, due to the size and complexity of GAGs, detailed knowledge about the structure and expression of GAGs by cells, the glycosaminoglycome, is lacking. Here we report a straightforward and versatile approach for structural domain mapping of complex mixtures of GAGs, GAGDoMa. The approach is based on orthogonal enzymatic depolymerization of the GAGs to generate internal, terminating, and initiating domains, and nanoflow reversed-phase ion-pairing chromatography with negative mode higher-energy collision dissociation (HCD) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for structural characterization of the individual domains. GAGDoMa provides a detailed structural insight into the glycosaminoglycome, and offers an important tool for deciphering the complexity of GAGs in cellular physiology and pathology.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidTandem Mass SpectrometryCarbohydrate SequenceCell LineChondroitin SulfatesChromatography, Reverse-PhaseDermatan SulfateGlycosaminoglycansHumansChondroitin SulfatesDermatan SulfateGlycosaminoglycans

Identifiers

PMID32103093
PMCPMC7044218
OpenAlexW3008175193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.