Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103062›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

In Vitro CRISPR/Cas9-Directed Gene Editing to Model LRRK2 G2019S Parkinson's Disease in Common Marmosets.

Scott C Vermilyea, Alexander Babinski, Nina Tran, Samantha To, Scott Guthrie, Jillian H Kluss, Jenna Kropp Schmidt, Gregory J Wiepz, Michael G Meyer, Megan E Murphy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Basic and Preclinical Research for Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott C VermilyeaNeuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Alexander BabinskiWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Nina TranWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Samantha ToWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Scott GuthrieWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jillian H KlussCell Biology and Gene Expression Section, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jenna Kropp SchmidtWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Gregory J WiepzWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael G MeyerWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Megan E MurphyWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mark R CooksonCell Biology and Gene Expression Section, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-3831
Marina E EmborgNeuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. emborg@primate.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-6641
Thaddeus G GolosWisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

WNPRC Supplemental Request for Nonhuman Primate Enclosures to Equip HIV/AIDS-Related Research FacilitiesP51OD011106 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorota A. Grejner-Brzezinska · 2012 to 2026
$150.7M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Transgenic marmosets for translational stem cell researchR24OD019803 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI EMBORG, MARINA, GOLOS, THADDEUS G · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIH HHS P51 OD011106NIH HHS R24 OD019803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) G2019S is a relatively common mutation, associated with 1-3% of Parkinson's disease (PD) cases worldwide. G2019S is hypothesized to increase LRRK2 kinase activity. Dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells of PD patients carrying LRRK2 G2019S are reported to have several phenotypes compared to wild type controls, including increased activated caspase-3 and reactive oxygen species (ROS), autophagy dysfunction, and simplification of neurites. The common marmoset is envisioned as a candidate nonhuman primate species for comprehensive modeling of genetic mutations. Here, we report our successful use of CRISPR/Cas9 with repair template-mediated homology directed repair to introduce the LRRK2 G2019S mutation, as well as a truncation of the LRRK2 kinase domain, into marmoset embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. We found that, similar to humans, marmoset LRRK2 G2019S resulted in elevated kinase activity. Phenotypic evaluation after dopaminergic differentiation demonstrated LRRK2 G2019S-mediated increased intracellular ROS, decreased neuronal viability, and reduced neurite complexity. Importantly, these phenotypes were not observed in clones with LRRK2 truncation. These results demonstrate the feasibility of inducing monogenic mutations in common marmosets and support the use of this species for generating a novel genetic-based model of PD that expresses physiological levels of LRRK2 G2019S.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAutophagyCallithrixCell DifferentiationCRISPR-Cas SystemsDisease Models, AnimalDopaminergic NeuronsEmbryonic Stem CellsEndoplasmic Reticulum StressGene EditingInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2Mutagenesis, Site-DirectedNeuritesParkinson DiseaseLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2Reactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID32103062
PMCPMC7044232
OpenAlexW3007163138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.