Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32103047›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Transcriptome analysis of life stages of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, to improve insect crop production.

Brenda Oppert, Lindsey C Perkin, Marcé Lorenzen, Aaron T Dossey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Stage-resolved transcriptomic profiling ofFrontiers in insect science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda OppertUSDA ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, 1515 College Ave, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA. brenda.oppert@ars.usda.gov.
Lindsey C PerkinUSDA ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, 1515 College Ave, Manhattan, KS, 66502, USA.
Marcé LorenzenDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Aaron T DosseyAll Things Bugs LLC, 755 Research Parkway, Suite 465, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Center for Grain and Animal Health Research · USAll Things Bugs (United States) · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop genetic resources for the improvement of insects as food, we sequenced transcripts from embryos, one-day hatchlings, three nymphal stages, and male and female adults of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. A draft transcriptome was assembled from more than 138 million sequences combined from all life stages and sexes. The draft transcriptome assembly contained 45,866 contigs, and more than half were similar to sequences at NCBI (e value < e

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCrop ProductionEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGryllidaeInsect ProteinsLife Cycle StagesMaleNymphRNA InterferenceAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesInsect Proteinsstorage proteins, Insecta

Identifiers

PMID32103047
PMCPMC7044300
OpenAlexW3007399444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.