Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102969›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2020

Phosphotyrosine-based Phosphoproteomics for Target Identification and Drug Response Prediction in AML Cell Lines.

Carolien van Alphen, Jacqueline Cloos, Robin Beekhof, David G J Cucchi, Sander R Piersma, Jaco C Knol, Alex A Henneman, Thang V Pham, Johan van Meerloo, Gert J Ossenkoppele and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolien van AlphenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jacqueline CloosAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pediatric Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Robin BeekhofAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
David G J CucchiAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pediatric Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sander R PiersmaAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jaco C KnolAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alex A HennemanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Thang V PhamAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Johan van MeerlooAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gert J OssenkoppeleAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henk M W VerheulAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen J W M JanssenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Hematology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Connie R JimenezAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, Cancer Center; Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, OncoProteomics Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: c.jimenez@vumc.nl.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal disorder arising from hematopoietic myeloid progenitors. Aberrantly activated tyrosine kinases (TK) are involved in leukemogenesis and are associated with poor treatment outcome. Kinase inhibitor (KI) treatment has shown promise in improving patient outcome in AML. However, inhibitor selection for patients is suboptimal.In a preclinical effort to address KI selection, we analyzed a panel of 16 AML cell lines using phosphotyrosine (pY) enrichment-based, label-free phosphoproteomics. The Integrative Inferred Kinase Activity (INKA) algorithm was used to identify hyperphosphorylated, active kinases as candidates for KI treatment, and efficacy of selected KIs was tested.Heterogeneous signaling was observed with between 241 and 2764 phosphopeptides detected per cell line. Of 4853 identified phosphopeptides with 4229 phosphosites, 4459 phosphopeptides (4430 pY) were linked to 3605 class I sites (3525 pY). INKA analysis in single cell lines successfully pinpointed driver kinases (PDGFRA, JAK2, KIT and FLT3) corresponding with activating mutations present in these cell lines. Furthermore, potential receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) drivers, undetected by standard molecular analyses, were identified in four cell lines (FGFR1 in KG-1 and KG-1a, PDGFRA in Kasumi-3, and FLT3 in MM6). These cell lines proved highly sensitive to specific KIs. Six AML cell lines without a clear RTK driver showed evidence of MAPK1/3 activation, indicative of the presence of activating upstream RAS mutations. Importantly, FLT3 phosphorylation was demonstrated in two clinical AML samples with a

Indexed as

ProteomicsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCluster AnalysisComputer Simulationfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3HumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationPhosphorylationPhosphotyrosineProtein KinasesProteomeReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsFLT3 protein, humanfms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3PhosphotyrosineProtein KinasesProteomeacute myeloid leukemiacell signalingdrug targetskinase inhibitorsmass spectrometrymolecular biologypersonalized medicinephosphoproteomephosphoproteomicsreceptor tyrosine kinasesTyrosine kinases

Identifiers

PMID32102969
PMCPMC7196578
OpenAlexW3008680167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.