Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102853›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

The Lyme Disease Biobank: Characterization of 550 Patient and Control Samples from the East Coast and Upper Midwest of the United States.

Elizabeth J Horn, George Dempsey, Anna M Schotthoefer, U Lena Prisco, Matthew McArdle, Stephanie S Gervasi, Marc Golightly, Cathy De Luca, Mel Evans, Bobbi S Pritt and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Infection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth J HornLyme Disease Biobank, Portland, Oregon, USA info@lymebiobank.org.
George DempseyEast Hampton Family Medicine, East Hampton, New York, USA.
Anna M SchotthoeferMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
U Lena PriscoVineyard Center for Clinical Research, Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew McArdleLyme Disease Biobank, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Stephanie S GervasiLyme Disease Biobank, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Marc GolightlyDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Cathy De LucaDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Mel EvansDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Bobbi S PrittDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Elitza S TheelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Radha IyerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Dionysios LiverisDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Guiqing WangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Don GoldsteinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Ira SchwartzDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
New York Medical College · USStony Brook University · USMayo Clinic · USMarshfield Clinic · USMartha's Vineyard Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease (LD) is an increasing public health problem. Current laboratory testing is insensitive in early infection, the stage at which appropriate treatment is most effective in preventing disease sequelae. The Lyme Disease Biobank (LDB) collects samples from individuals with symptoms consistent with early LD presenting with or without erythema migrans (EM) or an annular, expanding skin lesion and uninfected individuals from areas of endemicity. Samples were collected from 550 participants (298 cases and 252 controls) according to institutional review board-approved protocols and shipped to a centralized biorepository. Testing was performed to confirm the presence of tick-borne pathogens by real-time PCR, and a subset of samples was tested for

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiBorrelia burgdorferi GroupLyme DiseaseBiological Specimen BanksEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansUnited StatesbiobankbiorepositorydiagnosticsLyme diseaseserology

Identifiers

PMID32102853
PMCPMC7269379
OpenAlexW3007735350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.