Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102816›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Using a machine learning approach to predict mortality in critically ill influenza patients: a cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study in Taiwan.

Chien-An Hu, Chia-Ming Chen, Yen-Chun Fang, Shinn-Jye Liang, Hao-Chien Wang, Wen-Feng Fang, Chau-Chyun Sheu, Wann-Cherng Perng, Kuang-Yao Yang, Kuo-Chin Kao and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Machine learning prediction of survival in centenarians after age 100: a retrospective, population-based cohort study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chien-An Hu *Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chia-Ming Chen *Department of Applied Mathematics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yen-Chun FangDepartment of Management Information Systems, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shinn-Jye LiangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hao-Chien WangDivision of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Feng FangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chau-Chyun SheuDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wann-Cherng PerngDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuang-Yao YangDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chin KaoDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chieh-Liang WuCenter for Quality Management, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chwei-Shyong TsaiDepartment of Management Information Systems, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ming-Yen LinDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan cwc081@hotmail.com linmy@mail.fcu.edu.tw.
Wen-Cheng ChaoDivision of Chest, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan cwc081@hotmail.com linmy@mail.fcu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-9631-8934
TSIRC (Taiwan Severe Influenza Research Consortium)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent mortality prediction models used in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a limited role for specific diseases such as influenza, and we aimed to establish an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting mortality in critically ill influenza patients using a real-world severe influenza data set. STUDY

designA cross-sectional retrospective multicentre study in Taiwan

settingEight medical centres in Taiwan.

participantsA total of 336 patients requiring ICU-admission for virology-proven influenza at eight hospitals during an influenza epidemic between October 2015 and March 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We employed extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to establish the prediction model, compared the performance with logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF), demonstrated the feature importance categorised by clinical domains, and used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for visualised interpretation.

resultsThe data set contained 76 features of the 336 patients with severe influenza. The severity was apparently high, as shown by the high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (22, 17 to 29) and pneumonia severity index score (118, 88 to 151). XGBoost model (area under the curve (AUC): 0.842; 95% CI 0.749 to 0.928) outperformed RF (AUC: 0.809; 95% CI 0.629 to 0.891) and LR (AUC: 0.701; 95% CI 0.573 to 0.825) for predicting 30-day mortality. To give clinicians an intuitive understanding of feature exploitation, we stratified features by the clinical domain. The cumulative feature importance in the fluid balance domain, ventilation domain, laboratory data domain, demographic and symptom domain, management domain and severity score domain was 0.253, 0.113, 0.177, 0.140, 0.152 and 0.165, respectively. We further used SHAP plots to illustrate associations between features and 30-day mortality in critically ill influenza patients.

conclusionsWe used a real-world data set and applied an ML approach, mainly XGBoost, to establish a practical and explainable mortality prediction model in critically ill influenza patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesTaiwanadult intensive & critical careinfectious diseases & infestationsinformation technologythoracic medicine

Identifiers

PMID32102816
PMCPMC7045134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.