Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102815›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Use of social media for cancer prevention and early diagnosis: scoping review protocol.

Aradhna Kaushal, Angelos P Kassianos, Jessica Sheringham, Jo Waller, Christian von Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aradhna KaushalDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK aradhna.kaushal.14@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3815-0624
Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Jessica SheringhamDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Jo WallerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Christian von WagnerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7971-0691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial media platforms offer unique opportunities for health promotion messages focusing on cancer prevention and early diagnosis. However, there has been very little synthesis of the evaluation of such campaigns, limiting the ability to apply learning to the design of future social media campaigns. We aimed to provide a broad overview of the current research base on social media interventions for cancer prevention and early diagnosis, to identify knowledge gaps and to inform policy, practice and future research questions.

methodsWe will use scoping review methodology to explore the available evidence on social media interventions for cancer prevention and early diagnosis, with a focus on methodological approaches. Quantitative and qualitative studies and reports will be identified through searching several research databases, through internet searching for grey literature and by screening the citations of studies included in the review. All identified studies will undergo independent title and abstract screening and full-text screening against inclusion and exclusion criteria. We plan to chart the data from included studies to record the characteristics of the social media interventions, resources, activities, outputs, outcomes and impact. Charted data will be collated and summarised using a narrative synthesis. The interpretation and implications of the findings will be enhanced by consultation with relevant stakeholders such as public health organisations, cancer charities, and patient and public involvement groups when preliminary results are available. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. The results will be used to identify research questions for future systematic reviews and to inform the development of future social media interventions. We will disseminate findings in peer-reviewed journals and at relevant conferences.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerEvidence-Based MedicineHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansNeoplasmsPublic HealthScoping Reviews as TopicSocial Mediahealth policypublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID32102815
PMCPMC7045187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.