ArticleBMJ open2020
Trabeculotomy versus combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy for primary congenital glaucoma: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Comparison between modified and conventional combined Trabeculotomy-Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C for intraocular pressure reduction in primary congenital glaucoma.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Animal Model Contributions to Primary Congenital Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Ab Interno Goniotomy Combined with Ab Externo Trabeculotomy in Advanced Primary Congenital Glaucoma Patients: 2-Year Follow-Up.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Ab externo 240-degree trabeculotomy versus trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy in primary congenital glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTrabeculotomy and combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy (CTT) are major surgical options for primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). However, it is unclear which of these two surgical procedures should be recommended as the optimum first-line treatment for PCG. This trial aims to determine whether the outcomes of trabeculotomy are non-inferior to those of CTT in moderate PCG with a horizontal corneal diameter (HCD) of 12-14 mm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 3-year, non-inferiority, prospective, randomised controlled trial. We plan to recruite 248 participants (aged ≤3 years) with PCG with an HCD of 12-14 mm from the Department of Glaucoma, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. One eye per participant will be randomly (1:1) assigned to receive trabeculotomy or CTT. The primary outcome is the 3-year postoperative success rate in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), and the secondary clinical outcomes will include IOP reduction, visual acuity, HCD, central corneal thickness, axial length, cup-disc ratio, refractive error and postoperative complications. Data will be analysed by the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICAL APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (2014MEKY023) and the '5010 Plan' evaluation committee at Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. The results will be disseminated in international academic meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-14005588; Date registered: 20 November 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.