Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102713›Full record

ReviewPublic health nutrition2021

Developing a conceptual framework for implementation science to evaluate a nutrition intervention scaled-up in a real-world setting.

Haribondhu Sarma, Catherine D'Este, Tahmeed Ahmed, Thomas J Bossert, Cathy Banwell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Methodological considerations for evaluating scale-up programmes in healthcare: a methods review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Review
  4. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haribondhu SarmaResearch School of Population Health, Colleague of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-8498
Catherine D'EsteResearch School of Population Health, Colleague of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT2601, Australia.
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh.
Thomas J BossertDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Cathy BanwellResearch School of Population Health, Colleague of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to identify and develop a comprehensive conceptual framework using implementation science that can be applied to assess a nutrition intervention in a real-world setting.

designWe conducted a narrative review using electronic databases and a manual search to identify implementation science frameworks, models and theories published in peer-reviewed journals. We performed a qualitative thematic analysis of these publications to generate a framework that could be applied to nutrition implementation science.

resultsBased on this review, we developed a comprehensive framework which we have conceptualised as an implementation science process that describes the transition from the use of scientific evidence through to scaling-up with the aim of making an intervention sustainable. The framework consisted of three domains: Domain i - efficacy to effectiveness trials, Domain ii - scaling-up and Domain iii - sustainability. These three domains encompass five components: identifying an 'effective' intervention; scaling-up and implementation fidelity; course corrections during implementation; promoting sustainability of interventions and consideration of a comprehensive methodological paradigm to identify 'effective' interventions and to assess the process and outcome indicators of implementation. The framework was successfully applied to a nutrition implementation program in Bangladesh.

conclusionsOur conceptual framework built from an implantation science perspective offers a comprehensive approach supported by a foundational and holistic understanding of its key components. This framework provides guidance for implementation researchers, policy-makers and programme managers to identify and review an effective intervention, to scale it up and to sustain it over time.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelImplementation ScienceBangladeshHumansResearch DesignConceptual frameworkImplementation of interventionImplementation scienceNutrition implementation science

Identifiers

PMID32102713
PMCPMC8045137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.