Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102526›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2020

Value of CCNA1 promoter methylation in triaging ASC-US cytology.

Shina Oranratanaphan, Kewalin Kobwitaya, Wichai Termrungruanglert, Surang Triratanachat, Nakarin Kitkumthorn, Apiwat Mutirangura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. HighZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. LINE-1 and Alu Methylation in hrHPV-Associated Precancerous Cervical Samples.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022
    Article
  9. CyclinA1 Promoter Methylation in Self-Sampling Test.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shina OranratanaphanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University.ORCID 0000000337387061
Kewalin KobwitayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University.
Wichai TermrungruanglertKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University.
Surang TriratanachatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University.
Nakarin KitkumthornCenter of Excellence in Molecular Genetics of Cancer and Human Diseases, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok Thailand.
Apiwat MutiranguraCenter of Excellence in Molecular Genetics of Cancer and Human Diseases, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background<br />Using HPV testing to triage ASC-US still has some problems of unnecessary colposcopy in many cases. A previous study reported that methylation of CCNA1, a tumor suppressor gene, can differentiate between low and high grade lesions. This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic values and application of CCNA1 methylation in the patients with ASC-US group.<br />Materials and methods:<br />Cross sectional analytic study was conducted in the patients with <br />ASC-US cytology. HPV DNA testing and CCNA1 promoter methylation testing were performed. The patients were sent for colposcopic examination and biopsy. Biopsy results were considered as gold standard. Diagnostic test of HPV test and CCNA1 methylation test were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), likelihood ratio for test positive and negative and 95% confidence interval.<br />Results:<br />One hundred and seventy patients were enrolled. Mean age was 39.7 years old. HR-HPV was positive in 70% of the patients. HPV type 16, type 18 and non-16,18 were 12.4%, 4.7% and 42.4%, respectively. CIN2+ were found in 12.4% (21 cases). CCNA1 promoter methylation was positive in 5 cases. CCNA1 had high specificity 99.3%, NPV 89.2% and PPV 80% in detection of CIN2+ but sensitivity was 19%. Likelihood ratio for positive test was 28.4 and likelihood ratio for negative test was 0.8. HPV test had sensitivity of 90.5% and NPV of 95.9% but low specificity and PPV as 31.5% and 15.7%, respectively.<br />Conclusion:<br /> CCNA1 promoter methylation testing had very high specificity, likelihood ratio for the positive test and PPV (99.3%, 28.4 and 80.0, respectively). Therefore, CCNA1 promoter methylation test may be used in the HPV DNA positive cases to classify the urgency of colposcopy and the colposcopist should pay more attention to CCNA1 positive patients because of their higher chance to identify the significant lesions.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPromoter Regions, GeneticAdultAtypical Squamous Cells of the CervixBiopsyColposcopyCyclin A1FemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18Human Papillomavirus DNA TestsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsCCNA1 protein, humanCyclin A1accuracyASC-USCCNA1CIN2+diagnostic value

Identifiers

PMID32102526
PMCPMC7332146
OpenAlexW3006886430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.