ArticleCells2020
Convolutional Neural Networks-Based Image Analysis for the Detection and Quantification of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.
Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A semi-automated imaging and analysis pipeline for NET quantification and temporal-profiling of NETosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer: From mechanisms to treatments.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- NETQUANT2: automated web-based quantification of neutrophil extracellular traps from fluorescence microscopy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Trapalyzer: a computer program for quantitative analyses in fluorescent live-imaging studies of neutrophil extracellular trap formation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Emerging Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Gastrointestinal Tumors: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Competitive fitness analysis using Convolutional Neural Network.Journal of nematology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over a decade ago, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) was described as a novel mechanism employed by neutrophils to tackle infections. Currently applied methods for NETs release quantification are often limited by the use of unspecific dyes and technical difficulties. Therefore, we aimed to develop a fully automatic image processing method for the detection and quantification of NETs based on live imaging with the use of DNA-staining dyes. For this purpose, we adopted a recently proposed Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model called Mask R-CNN. The adopted model detected objects with quality comparable to manual counting-Over 90% of detected cells were classified in the same manner as in manual labelling. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of GW 311616A (neutrophil elastase inhibitor) on NETs release, observed microscopically, was confirmed with the use of the CNN model but not by extracellular DNA release measurement. We have demonstrated that a modern CNN model outperforms a widely used quantification method based on the measurement of DNA release and can be a valuable tool to quantitate the formation process of NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.