Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32102295›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

An Extension of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Hesitant Fuzzy Sets to Assess the Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry.

Jalil Heidary Dahooie, Amir Salar Vanaki, Hamid Reza Firoozfar, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Audrius Čereška

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Contribution of MCDM to SUMP: The Case of Spanish Cities during 2006-2021.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jalil Heidary DahooieFaculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-6670
Amir Salar VanakiFaculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran.
Hamid Reza FiroozfarFaculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran.
Edmundas Kazimieras ZavadskasInstitute of Sustainable Construction, Laboratory of Operational Research, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio av. 11, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-3201-949X
Audrius ČereškaDepartment of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Basanaviciaus str. 28, LT-03324 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construction industry is considered as one of the most dangerous industries in terms of occupational safety and has a high rate of occupational incidents and risks compared to other industries. Given the importance of identifying and assessing the occupational hazards in this industry, researchers have conducted numerous studies using statistical methods, multi-criteria decision-making methods, expert-based judgments, and so on. Although, these researchers have used linguistic variables, fuzzy sets and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets to overcome challenges such as uncertainty and ambiguity in the risk assessment conducted by experts; the previous models lack in efficiency if the experts are hesitant in their assessment. This leads to the inability to assign a specific membership degree to any risk. Therefore, in this research, it is tried to provide an improved approach to the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method using an Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method based on the hesitant fuzzy set, which can effectively cope with the hesitance of the experts in the evaluation. Also, Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method is applied for risk factor weighing in the proposed approach. This model is applied to a construction industry case study to solve a realistic occupational risk assessment. Moreover, a comparison is made between the results of this model and those obtained by the conventional FMEA and some other aggregation operators. The results indicate that the newly developed approach is useful and flexible to address complex FMEA problems and can generate logical and reliable priority rankings for failure modes.

Indexed as

Construction IndustryHealthcare Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisOccupational HealthDecision MakingFuzzy LogicHumansUncertaintyconstruction industryfailure mode and effect analysishesitant fuzzy setMCDMoccupational hazardsrisk management

Identifiers

PMID32102295
PMCPMC7068495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.