ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2020
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer undetected by high-sensitivity allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assays.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Advances in Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of G719X/L861Q/S768I Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024Review
- The Advantage of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing over qPCR in Testing for DruggableInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Real-world evidence of the intrinsic limitations of PCR-based EGFR mutation assay in non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Generation of osimertinib-resistant cells from epidermal growth factor receptor L858R/T790M mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is critical for planning lung cancer treatment. Sanger sequencing detects both known and novel mutations but shows poor sensitivity. High-sensitivity allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (ASRP)-based assays offer quick and reliable results, but may overlook uncommon mutations. We aimed to define the rate at which high-sensitivity ASRP-based assays missed uncommon EGFR mutations.
methodsNon-small cell lung cancer specimens that were diagnosed as EGFR wild-type (EGFR-WT) by high-sensitivity ASRP-based assays and had residual DNA samples were sent for Sanger sequencing. Patient characteristics and clinical features were evaluated by chart review, and outcomes of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy were studied.
resultsHundred DNA specimens diagnosed by high-sensitivity ASRP-based assays as EGFR-WT were rechecked by Sanger sequencing. Two samples which were re-biopsy specimens from patients with EGFR mutations were excluded from the analysis. Sanger sequencing was failed in 24 samples. Among the remaining 74 samples, 6 (8.1%) had EGFR mutations-one exhibited exon 19 deletion (delT751_I759insS), two exhibited substitution mutations (S768I+V769L and L861Q), and three exhibited exon 20 insertions (N771_P772insN, P772_H773insHP, and H773_V774insAH). Only the patient with the exon 19 deletion had received EGFR-TKI therapy. Although the best tumor response was only stable disease, this was maintained for >10 months.
conclusionHigh-sensitivity ASRP-based assays can overlook uncommon mutations. This detection failure rate is worth noting, especially when treating patients from regions known to have a high prevalence of EGFR mutation. Patients carrying uncommon mutations may still benefit from EGFR-TKI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.