ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Transcription Factor Binding in Embryonic Stem Cells Is Constrained by DNA Sequence Repeat Symmetry.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Bimodal specificity of TF-DNA recognition in embryonic stem cells.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Noncanonical binding of transcription factors: time to revisitMolecular biology of the cell · 2023Review
- Repetitive DNA symmetry elements negatively regulate gene expression in embryonic stem cells.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Epitome: predicting epigenetic events in novel cell types with multi-cell deep ensemble learning.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Understanding the Robustness of Protein Diffusion on DNA and Microtubules.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Soft Power of Nonconsensus Protein-DNA Binding.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription factor (TF) recognition is dictated by the underlying DNA motif sequence specific for each TF. Here, we reveal that DNA sequence repeat symmetry plays a central role in defining TF-DNA-binding preferences. In particular, we find that different TFs bind similar symmetry patterns in the context of different developmental layers. Most TFs possess dominant preferences for similar DNA repeat symmetry types. However, in some cases, preferences of specific TFs are changed during differentiation, suggesting the importance of information encoded outside of known motif regions. Histone modifications also exhibit strong preferences for similar DNA repeat symmetry patterns unique to each type of modification. Next, using an in vivo reporter assay, we show that gene expression in embryonic stem cells can be positively modulated by the presence of genomic and computationally designed DNA oligonucleotides containing identified nonconsensus-repetitive sequence elements. This supports the hypothesis that certain nonconsensus-repetitive patterns possess a functional ability to regulate gene expression. We also performed a solution NMR experiment to probe the stability of double-stranded DNA via imino proton resonances for several double-stranded DNA sequences characterized by different repetitive patterns. We suggest that such local stability might play a key role in determining TF-DNA binding preferences. Overall, our findings show that despite the enormous sequence complexity of the TF-DNA binding landscape in differentiating embryonic stem cells, this landscape can be quantitatively characterized in simple terms using the notion of DNA sequence repeat symmetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.