Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32101641›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2020

A super-combo-drug test to detect adverse drug events and drug interactions from electronic health records in the era of polypharmacy.

Anqi Zhu, Donglin Zeng, Li Shen, Xia Ning, Lang Li, Pengyue Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anqi ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Li ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-0503
Xia NingDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Lang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Pengyue ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-3592-9042
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Clinical Importance of Drug-Drug InteractionsR01AG025152 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2006 to 2021
$8.1M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Antidiabetic AgentsR01DK102694 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENNESSY, SEAN, LI, LANG · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01 GM10448301Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01LM011945Foundation for the National Institutes of Health RO1 GM117206NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025152NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK102694NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacoinformatics research has experienced a great deal of successes in detecting drug-induced adverse events (AEs) using large-scale health record databases. In the era of polypharmacy, pharmacoinformatics faces many new challenges, and two significant challenges are to detect high-order drug interactions and to handle strongly correlated drugs. In this article, we propose a super-combo-drug test (SupCD-T) to address the aforementioned two challenges. SupCD-T detects drug interactions by identifying optimal drug combinations with increased AE risks. In addition, SupCD-T increases the statistical powers to detect single-drug effects by combining strongly correlated drugs. Although SupCD-T does not distinguish single-drug effects from their combination effects, it is noticeably more powerful in selecting an individual drug effect in the multiple regression analysis, where confounding justification between two correlated drugs reduces the power in testing the individual drug effects on AEs. Our simulation studies demonstrate that SupCD-T has generally better power comparing with the multiple regression analysis. In addition, SupCD-T is able to select meaningful drug combinations (eg, highly coprescribed drugs). Using electronic health record database, we illustrate the utility of SupCD-T and discover a number of drug combinations that have increased risk in myopathy. Some novel drug combinations have not yet been investigated and reported in the pharmacology research.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug InteractionsElectronic Health RecordsHumansPolypharmacyPharmaceutical Preparationsadverse eventdrug interactionEHRpharmacoinformaticsSupCD-T

Identifiers

PMID32101641
PMCPMC7127937
OpenAlexW3008193293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.