Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32101587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Knowledge, attitude and practices on cholera in an arid county, Kenya, 2018: A mixed-methods approach.

Erick Otieno Orimbo, Elvis Oyugi, Diba Dulacha, Mark Obonyo, Abubakar Hussein, Jane Githuku, Maurice Owiny, Zeinab Gura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in a Sample of the Lebanese Population Regarding Cholera.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erick Otieno OrimboField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-7754
Elvis OyugiField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Diba DulachaField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mark ObonyoField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abubakar HusseinField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jane GithukuField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Maurice OwinyField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Zeinab GuraField Epidemiology and Laboratory Training (FELTP) Kenya, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ministry of Health · KEKenya School of Government · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholera remains a public health problem in Kenya despite increased efforts to create awareness. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in the community is essential for the planning and implementation of preventive measures. We assessed cholera KAP in a community in Isiolo County, Kenya.

methodsThis cross-sectional study involved a mixed-methods approach utilizing a questionnaire survey and focus group discussions (FGDs). Using multistage sampling with household as the secondary sampling unit, interviewers administered structured questionnaires to one respondent aged ≥18 years old per household. We created knowledge score by allotting one point for each correct response, considered any total score ≥ median score as high knowledge score, calculated descriptive statistics and used multivariate logistic regression to examine factors associated with high knowledge score. In FGDs, we randomly selected the participants aged ≥18 years and had lived in Isiolo for >1 year, conducted the FGDs using an interview guide and used content analysis to identify salient emerging themes.

resultsWe interviewed 428 participants (median age = 30 years; Q1 = 25, Q3 = 38) comprising 372 (86.9%) females. Of the 425/428 (99.3%) who had heard about cholera, 311/425 (73.2%) knew that it is communicable. Although 273/428 (63.8%) respondents knew the importance of treating drinking water, only 216/421 (51.3%) treated drinking water. Those with good defecation practice were 209/428 (48.8%). Respondents with high knowledge score were 227/428 (53.0%). Positive attitude (aOR = 2.88, 95% C.I = 1.34-6.20), treating drinking water (aOR = 2.21, 95% C.I = 1.47-3.33), age <36 years (aOR = 1.75, 95% C.I = 1.11-2.74) and formal education (aOR = 1.71, 95% C.I = 1.08-2.68) were independently associated with high knowledge score. FGDs showed poor latrine coverage, inadequate water treatment and socio-cultural beliefs as barriers to cholera prevention and control.

conclusionsThere was a high knowledge score on cholera with gaps in preventive practices. We recommend targeted health education to the old and uneducated persons and general strengthening of health education in the community.

Indexed as

Health EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCholeraCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32101587
PMCPMC7043758
OpenAlexW3007987746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.