Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32101565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of machine learning models for automatic detection of DNA double strand breaks after irradiation using a γH2AX foci assay.

Tim Hohmann, Jacqueline Kessler, Dirk Vordermark, Faramarz Dehghani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tim HohmannInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-7221
Jacqueline KesslerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Dirk VordermarkDepartment of Radiotherapy, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Faramarz DehghaniInstitute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation induces amongst other the most critical type of DNA damage: double-strand breaks (DSBs). Efficient repair of such damage is crucial for cell survival and genomic stability. The analysis of DSB associated foci assays is often performed manually or with automatic systems. Manual evaluation is time consuming and subjective, while most automatic approaches are prone to changes in experimental conditions or to image artefacts. Here, we examined multiple machine learning models, namely a multi-layer perceptron classifier (MLP), linear support vector machine classifier (SVM), complement naive bayes classifier (cNB) and random forest classifier (RF), to correctly classify γH2AX foci in manually labeled images containing multiple types of artefacts. All models yielded reasonable agreements to the manual rating on the training images (Matthews correlation coefficient >0.4). Afterwards, the best performing models were applied on images obtained under different experimental conditions. Thereby, the MLP model produced the best results with an F1 Score >0.9. As a consequence, we have demonstrated that the used approach is sufficient to mimic manual counting and is robust against image artefacts and changes in experimental conditions.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBiological AssayCell LineDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairHistonesHumansMachine LearningRadiation, IonizingDNAH2AX protein, humanHistones

Identifiers

PMID32101565
PMCPMC7043763
OpenAlexW3008189204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.