ArticleThe British journal of radiology2020
Real-time markerless tumour tracking with patient-specific deep learning using a personalised data generation strategy: proof of concept by phantom study.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Motion Management in Particle Therapy: Evolution, Challenges, and AI-Enabled Opportunities.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Use of a deep learning neural network to generate bone suppressed images for markerless lung tumor tracking.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Patient-specific prostate segmentation in kilovoltage images for radiation therapy intrafraction monitoring via deep learning.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Robust Real-Time Cancer Tracking via Dual-Panel X-Ray Images for Precision Radiotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based target decomposition for markerless lung tumor tracking in radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based target tracking with X-ray images for radiotherapy: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Deep neural network-based synthetic image digital fluoroscopy using digitally reconstructed tomography.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility study of deep learning-based markerless real-time lung tumor tracking with orthogonal X-ray projection images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results.Medical physics · 2022Article
- A Survey of Marker-Less Tracking and Registration Techniques for Health & Environmental Applications to Augmented Reality and Ubiquitous Geospatial Information Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFor real-time markerless tumour tracking in stereotactic lung radiotherapy, we propose a different approach which uses patient-specific deep learning (DL) using a personalised data generation strategy, avoiding the need for collection of a large patient data set. We validated our strategy with digital phantom simulation and epoxy phantom studies.
methodsWe developed lung tumour tracking for radiotherapy using a convolutional neural network trained for each phantom's lesion by using multiple digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from each phantom's treatment planning four-dimensional CT. We trained tumour-bone differentiation using large numbers of training DRRs generated with various projection geometries to simulate tumour motion. We solved the problem of using DRRs for training and X-ray images for tracking using the training DRRs with random contrast transformation and random noise addition.
resultsWe defined adequate tracking accuracy as the percentage frames satisfying <1 mm tracking error of the isocentre. In the simulation study, we achieved 100% tracking accuracy in 3 cm spherical and 1.5×2.25×3 cm ovoid masses. In the phantom study, we achieved 100 and 94.7% tracking accuracy in 3 cm and 2 cm spherical masses, respectively. This required 32.5 ms/frame (30.8 fps) real-time processing.
conclusionsWe proved the potential feasibility of a real-time markerless tumour tracking framework for stereotactic lung radiotherapy based on patient-specific DL with personalised data generation with digital phantom and epoxy phantom studies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Using DL with personalised data generation is an efficient strategy for real-time lung tumour tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.