Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32101453›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2020

Phantomless assessment of volumetric bone mineral density using virtual non-contrast images from spectral detector computed tomography.

David Zopfs, Simon Lennartz, Charlotte Zaeske, Martin Merkt, Kai Roman Laukamp, Robert Peter Reimer, David Maintz, Jan Borggrefe, Nils Grosse Hokamp

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing bone health evaluation in Hermann's tortoises (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David ZopfsUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-7453
Simon LennartzUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
Charlotte ZaeskeUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
Martin MerktUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kai Roman LaukampUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
Robert Peter ReimerUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
David MaintzUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
Jan BorggrefeUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
Nils Grosse HokampUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate phantomless assessment of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) based on virtual non-contrast images of arterial (VNC

methods104 consecutive patients who underwent triphasic spectral detector CT between January 2018 and April 2019 were retrospectively included. TNC, VNC

resultsvBMD values obtained from CI

conclusionSpectral detector CT-derived virtual non-contrast images systematically underestimate vBMD and therefore should not be used without appropriate adjustments. Adjusted venous phase images provide reliable results and may be utilized for an opportunistic BMD screening in CT examinations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Adjustments of venous phase images facilitate opportunistic assessment of vBMD, while spectral detector CT-derived VNC images systematically underestimate vBMD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID32101453
PMCPMC7217579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.