Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32101308›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Systematic Dementia Screening by Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Nursing Homes for Reducing Emergency Department Transfers: The IDEM Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yves Rolland, Neda Tavassoli, Philipe de Souto Barreto, Amélie Perrin, Clarisse Laffon de Mazières, Thomas Rapp, Sophie Hermabessière, Elodie Tournay, Bruno Vellas, Sandrine Andrieu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01569997 (Interest of Systematic Tracking of Dementia Cases in Nursing Homes), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01569997 nacompletednot on this map

Interest of Systematic Tracking of Dementia Cases in Nursing Homes: Analysing the Contribution of MultiDisciplinary Team Meeting (MDTM) in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToulouseRan2010 to 2013Enrolled1,428ConditionsDementia in Nursing HomeArmsMultiDisciplinary Team Meetings (MDTM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Do not PIMP my nursing home ride! The impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Prescribing on residents' emergency care use.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yves RollandGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Neda TavassoliGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Philipe de Souto BarretoGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Amélie PerrinGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Clarisse Laffon de MazièresGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Thomas RappLIRAES (EA 4470) & Chaire AGEINOMIX, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sophie HermabessièreGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Elodie TournayUnité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Bruno VellasGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sandrine AndrieuGérontopôle de Toulouse, Département de Médecine Interne et Gérontologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInserm · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Dementia is often underdiagnosed in nursing homes (NHs). This potentially results in inappropriate care, and high rates of emergency department (ED) transfers in particular. Objective: To assess whether systematic dementia screening of NH residents combined with multidisciplinary team meetings resulted in a lower rate of ED transfer at 12 months compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, cluster randomized trial with NHs as the unit of randomization. The IDEM (Impact of Systematic Tracking of Dementia Cases on the Rate of Hospitalization in Emergency Care Units) trial took place at 64 public and private NHs in France. Recruitment started on May 1, 2010, and was completed on March 31, 2012. Residents who were aged 60 years or older, had no diagnosed or documented dementia, were not bedridden, had lived in the NH for at least 1 month at inclusion, and had a life expectancy greater than 12 months were included. The residents were followed up for 18 months. The main study analyses were completed on October 14, 2016. Intervention: Two parallel groups were compared: an intervention group consisting of NHs that set up 2 multidisciplinary team meetings to identify residents with dementia and to discuss an appropriate care plan, and a control group consisting of NHs that continued their usual practice. During the inclusion period of 23 months, all residents of participating NHs who met eligibility criteria were included in the study. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point (ED transfer) was analyzed at 12 months, but the residents included were followed up for 18 months. Results: A total of 64 NHs participated in the study and enrolled 1428 residents (mean [SD] age, 84.7 [8.1] years; 1019 [71.3%] female): 599 in the intervention group (32 NHs) and 829 in the control group (32 NHs). The final study visit was completed by 1042 residents (73.0%). The main reason for early discontinuation was death (318 residents [22.7%]). The intervention did not reduce the risk of ED transfers during the 12-month follow-up: the proportion of residents transferred at least once to an ED during the 12-month follow-up was 16.2% in the intervention group vs 12.8% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.83-2.09; P = .24). Conclusions and Relevance: This study failed to demonstrate that systematic screening for dementia in NHs resulted in fewer ED transfers. The findings do not support implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings for systematic dementia screening of all NH residents, beyond the national recommendations for dementia diagnosis, to reduce ED transfers. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01569997.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDementiaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleMass ScreeningNursing HomesPatient Care Team

Identifiers

PMID32101308
PMCPMC7137681
OpenAlexW3007373068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.