ArticleJAMA network open2020
A Comparison of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure and Cancer Referred to Palliative Care.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation of Palliative Care for Patients with Heart failure - a Rapid Synthesis of Reviews.Current heart failure reports · 2025Pooled it
- Differences in family caregiver experiences and expectations of end-of-life heart failure care across providers and settings: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Development and Implementation of Needs-Based Palliative Care Tools in Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- [Palliative care in patients with left ventricular assist devices: systematic review].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Prognostic Models to Trigger Palliative Care Referrals in Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.CJC open · 2026Review
- Awareness and misconceptions of palliative care among paid, unpaid, and non-caregivers in the U.S.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Palliative Care in Advanced Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Guided Goals of Care Conversations Reveal Evolving, Personalized Priorities.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026Article
- The current state of palliative care research in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Designing a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Timely Palliative Care in Heart Failure.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Patterns and predictors of palliative care use in acute heart failure hospitalizations.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of specialised outpatient palliative care in heart failure and cancer patients: a German cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Palliative Continuous Intravenous Inotrope Support Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Falling Short: Low Palliative Care Use Among Patients With Heart Failure Receiving Palliative Continuous Intravenous Inotrope Support.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Screening and Needs Assessment Tools for Palliative Care in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Narrative Review.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Palliative and End-of-Life Care During Critical Cardiovascular Illness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Elements of effective palliative care interventions in advanced heart failure: A narrative review.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Growing evidence shows that palliative care (PC) improves treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), but few large-scale studies have prospectively evaluated the processes and outcomes associated with PC consultation for such patients in the real world. Objective: To characterize processes and outcomes of PC consultations for hospitalized patients with HF compared with patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of inpatient encounters at community and academic hospitals in the Palliative Care Quality Network enrolled participants between 2013 and 2017. Of a total of 135 197 patients, 57 272 adults with a primary diagnosis of HF or cancer receiving PC consultation were enrolled. Data analysis was performed from April 2018 to December 2019. Exposures: Primary diagnosis of HF or cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptom improvement and changes in care planning documentation after PC consultation. Results: At the time of consultation, patients with HF were older (mean age, 75.3 years [95% CI, 75.0-75.5 years] vs 65.2 years [95% CI, 65.0-65.3 years]; P < .001), had lower Palliative Performance Scale scores (mean, 35.6% [95% CI, 35.3%-35.9%] vs 42.4% [95% CI, 42.2%-42.6%]; P < .001), and were more likely to be in a critical care unit (5808 of 16 741 patients [35.3%] vs 4985 of 40 531 patients [12.5%]; P < .001) or a telemetry or step-down unit (5802 of 16 741 patients [35.2%] vs 7651 of 40 531 patients [19.2%]; P < .001) compared with patients with cancer. Patients with HF were less likely than patients with cancer to be referred to PC within 24 hours of admission (6773 of 16 741 patients [41.2%] vs 19 348 of 40 531 patients [49.0%]; P < .001) and had longer hospitalizations before receiving PC consultation requests (mean, 4.6 days [95% CI, 4.4-4.8 days] vs 3.9 days [95% CI, 3.8-4.0 days]; P < .001). Patients with HF were referred less frequently for symptoms other than pain (1686 of 16 488 patients [10.2%] vs 8587 of 39 609 patients [21.7%]; P < .001), but were equally likely to report improvements in anxiety (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.02; P = .08) and more likely to report improvements in dyspnea (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.83-2.57; P < .001) compared with patients with cancer. Patients with HF were less likely than those with cancer to be discharged alive (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96; P = .02) or to be referred to hospice (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.47-0.53; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that PC referral comes late for patients with HF and is used primarily to discuss care planning. Practitioners caring for patients with HF should consider involving PC experts earlier for symptom management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.