ReviewESC heart failure2020
How to develop a national heart failure clinics network: a consensus document of the Hellenic Heart Failure Association.
Review in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognosis and Risk Stratification of Patients with Advanced Heart Failure Followed-Up on an Outpatient Clinic.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Heart failure clinic inclusion and exclusion criteria: cross-sectional study of clinic's and referring provider's perspectives.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Current status of outpatient heart failure management in Egypt and recommendations for the future.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Structural components for the development of a heart failure network.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Practical Approaches to Build and Sustain a Cardio-Oncology Clinic.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- First symptoms and health care pathways in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure: ICPS2 survey. A report from the Heart Failure Working Group (GICC) of the French Society of Cardiology.Clinical cardiology · 2021Observational
- Distribution, infrastructure, and expertise of heart failure and cardio-oncology clinics in a developing network: temporal evolution and challenges during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- 10 year trends in hospitalization rates due to heart failure and related in-hospital mortality in Poland (2010-2019).ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- Heart failure guidelines implementation: Lifting barriers using registries and networks.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- How to develop a national heart failure clinics network: a consensus document of the Hellenic Heart Failure Association.ESC heart failure · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is rapidly growing, conferring considerable mortality, morbidity, and costs. Dedicated HF clinics improve patient outcomes, and the development of a national HF clinics network aims at addressing this need at national level. Such a network should respect the existing health care infrastructures, and according to the capacities of hosting facilities, it can be organized into three levels. Establishing the continuous communication and interaction among the components of the network is crucial, while supportive actions that can enhance its efficiency include involvement of multidisciplinary health care professionals, use of structured HF-specific documents, such as discharge notes, patient information leaflets, and patient booklets, and implementation of an HF-specific electronic health care record and database platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.