Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100664›Full record

ArticleAnimal : an international journal of animal bioscience2020

Community-based sheep breeding programs generated substantial genetic gains and socioeconomic benefits.

A Haile, T Getachew, T Mirkena, G Duguma, S Gizaw, M Wurzinger, J Soelkner, O Mwai, T Dessie, A Abebe and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genetic Evaluation of Reproductive Traits of Ethiopian Sheep Breeds Under Community-Based Breeding Programmes.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

A HaileResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-0487
T GetachewResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
T MirkenaEmergency Center for Transboundary Animal Diseases, FAO, PO Box 5536, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
G DugumaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Wollega University, PO Box 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
S GizawLivestock Genetics Research Program, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
M WurzingerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1180, Vienna, Austria.
J SoelknerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1180, Vienna, Austria.
O MwaiLivestock Genetics Research Program, ILRI, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya.
T DessieLivestock Genetics Research Program, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
A AbebeAnimal Sciences Case Team, Debre Berhan Agricultural Research Center, PO Box 112, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Z AbateAnimal Sciences Case Team, Bonga Agricultural Research Center, PO Box 101, Bonga, Ethiopia.
T JembereAnimal Sciences Case Team, Bako Agricultural Research Center, PO Box 21, Bako, Ethiopia.
M RekikResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
R N B LoboEmbrapa Caprinos e Ovinos, Caixa Postal 71, CEP 62010-970, Sobral, CE, Brazil.
J M MwacharoResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Z G TerfaResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
G T KassieResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
J P MuellerNational Institute for Agricultural Technology (INTA), Bariloche, Argentina.
B RischkowskyResilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program (RALSP), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) for small ruminants have been suggested as alternatives to centralised, government-controlled breeding schemes which have been implemented in many developing countries. An innovative methodological framework on how to design, implement and sustain CBBPs was tested in three sites in Ethiopia: Bonga, Horro and Menz. In these CBBPs, the main selection trait identified through participatory approaches was 6-month weight in all three sites. In Horro and Bonga, where resources such as feed and water permitted larger litter sizes, twinning rate was included. Ten-year (2009 to 2018) performance data from the breeding programs were analysed using Average Information Restricted Maximum Likelihood method (AI-REML). Additionally, the socioeconomic impact of CBBPs was assessed. Results indicated that 6-month weight increased over the years in all breeds. In Bonga, the average increase was 0.21 ± 0.018 kg/year, followed by 0.18 ± 0.007 and 0.11 ± 0.003 kg/year in Horro and Menz, respectively. This was quite substantial in an on-farm situation. The birth weight of lambs did not improve over the years in Bonga and Horro sheep but significant increases occurred in Menz. Considering that there was no direct selection on birth weight in the community flock, the increased weights observed in Menz could be due to correlated responses, but this was not the case in Bonga and Horro. The genetic trend for prolificacy over the years in both Bonga and Horro flocks was positive and significant (P < 0.01). This increase in litter size, combined with the increased 6-month body weight, increased income by 20% and farm-level meat consumption from slaughter of one sheep per year to three. The results show that CBBPs are technically feasible, result in measurable genetic gains in performance traits and impact the livelihoods of farmers.

Indexed as

BreedingSheepAnimalsBody WeightEthiopiaFemaleLitter SizeMalePhenotypePregnancySocioeconomic Factorsbody weightgenetic parametergenetic trendlocal breedssheep

Identifiers

PMID32100664
PMCPMC7301245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.