Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100630›Full record

ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2020

Affordable passive 3D-printed prosthesis for persons with partial hand amputation.

Raghad Alturkistani, Kavin A, Suresh Devasahayam, Raji Thomas, Esther L Colombini, Carlos A Cifuentes, Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam, Helge A Wurdemann, Mehran Moazen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 3D printing and prostheses: The current state-of-the-art and future directions.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Raghad AlturkistaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Kavin AChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
Suresh DevasahayamChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
Raji ThomasChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
Esther L ColombiniInstitute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Carlos A CifuentesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-865X
Shervanthi Homer-VanniasinkamDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Helge A WurdemannDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Mehran MoazenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-2975
University College London · GBChristian Medical College & Hospital · INEscuela Colombiana de Ingenieria Julio Garavito · COUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimPartial hand amputations are common in developing countries and have a negative impact on patients and their families' quality of life. The uniqueness of each partial hand amputation, coupled with the relatively high costs of prostheses, makes it challenging to provide suitable prosthetic solutions in developing countries. Current solutions often have long lead times and require a high level of expertise to produce. The aim of this study was to design and develop an affordable patient-specific partial hand prosthesis for developing countries. TECHNIQUE: The prosthesis was designed for a patient with transmetacarpal amputation (i.e. three amputated fingers and partial palm). The final design was passive, controlled by the contralateral hand, and utilized the advanced flexibility properties of thermoplastic polyurethane in a glove-like design that costs approximately 20 USD to fabricate. Quantitative and qualitative tests were conducted to assess performance of the device after the patient used the final design. A qualitative assessment was performed to gather the patient's feedback following a series of tests of grasp taxonomy. A quantitative assessment was performed through a grasp and lift test to measure the prosthesis' maximum load capacity. DISCUSSION: This study showed that the prosthesis enhanced the patient's manual handling capabilities, mainly in the form of grasp stability. The prosthesis was light weight and could be donned and doffed by the patient independently. Limitations include the need to use the contralateral hand to achieve grasping and low grasp strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Persons with partial hand amputation in developing countries lack access to affordable functional prostheses, hindering their ability to participate in the community. 3D-printed prostheses can provide a low-cost solution that is adaptable to different amputation configurations.

Indexed as

Amputation, TraumaticArtificial LimbsHand InjuriesHumansMalePrinting, Three-DimensionalProsthesis Designlow-cost prosthesispartial hand amputationThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID32100630
PMCPMC7364768
OpenAlexW3007357311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.