Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100541›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2020

Boosting the Osteogenic and Angiogenic Performance of Multiscale Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffolds by

Betül Aldemir Dikici, Gwendolen C Reilly, Frederik Claeyssens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Emulsion templating of PCL:PGS methacrylate blends for soft tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Advantages and prospects of cell derived decellularized extracellular matrix as tissue engineering scaffolds].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Betül Aldemir DikiciDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-469X
Gwendolen C ReillyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, INSIGNEO Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, The Pam Liversidge Building, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-1071
Frederik ClaeyssensDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-939X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L012669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering (TE)-based bone grafts are favorable alternatives to autografts and allografts. Both biochemical properties and the architectural features of TE scaffolds are crucial in their design process. Synthetic polymers are attractive biomaterials to be used in the manufacturing of TE scaffolds, due to various advantages, such as being relatively inexpensive, enabling precise reproducibility, possessing tunable mechanical/chemical properties, and ease of processing. However, such scaffolds need modifications to improve their limited interaction with biological tissues. Structurally, multiscale porosity is advantageous over single-scale porosity; therefore, in this study, we have considered two key points in the design of a bone repair material; (i) manufacture of multiscale porous scaffolds made of photocurable polycaprolactone (PCL) by a combination of emulsion templating and three-dimensional (3D) printing and (ii) decoration of these scaffolds with the

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsChickensChorioallantoic MembraneExtracellular MatrixHumansModels, BiologicalNeovascularization, PhysiologicOsteogenesisPolyestersPorosityPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsBiocompatible MaterialspolycaprolactonePolyesters3D printingangiogenesisbiohybriddecellularizationemulsion templatingpolyHIPEtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32100541
PMCPMC7146758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.