Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100383›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2020

Objective measurement of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms outside the clinic using the QbCheck: Reliability and validity.

Fredrik Ulberstad, Hans Boström, Mira-Lynn Chavanon, Martin Knollmann, James Wiley, Hanna Christiansen, Lisa B Thorell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. It Takes Time: Vigilance and Sustained Attention Assessment in Adults with ADHD.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Movement Patterns in Students Diagnosed with ADHD, Objective Measurement in a Natural Learning Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fredrik UlberstadDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hans BoströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mira-Lynn ChavanonClinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Germany.
Martin KnollmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
James WileyFocus-MD, Mobile, Alabama.
Hanna ChristiansenClinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Germany.
Lisa B ThorellDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7417-6637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective measurements of ADHD symptom levels can be a highly valuable complement to ratings. However, sometimes it is not feasible to bring patients into the clinic/lab for assessment. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the psychometric properties of the QbCheck, an online computerized test that measures errors and reaction time as well as activity during testing using the computer's built-in web camera. Study I (n = 27 adolescents/adults) investigated test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the QbCheck. Study II included 142 adolescents/adults (69 with ADHD/73 controls) and investigated convergent and diagnostic validity, as well as usability, of the QbCheck. In Study I, the QbCheck showed high test-retest reliability and high concurrent validity. In Study II, high convergent validity was observed when studying associations between the QbCheck performed in the home and the QbTest performed at the clinic. In addition, the QbCheck discriminated well between patients with ADHD and controls, with a sensitivity of 82.6 and a specificity of 79.5. The QbCheck appears to be a valuable test with good psychometric properties and will thereby enable assessment of ADHD symptom levels in adolescents and adults outside the clinic in the home setting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultADHDdiagnosisobjective measurementreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32100383
PMCPMC7301281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.