ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020
Comparison of the serum level of interleukin-4 in patients with brucellosis and healthy controls.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytokine and Oxidative Stress Imbalances in Relation to Complex Coronary Lesions in Elderly Patients.Current vascular pharmacology · 2025Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Interleukin-4 by Immunowall Devices Made of Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of the serum level of interleukin-4 in patients with brucellosis and healthy controls.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvaluation of cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) can be an important tool in examining immune responses to brucellosis. Also, determining the response rate to treatment is necessary for controlling and eradicating of disease. The review of previous studies reveals contradictory results that require further research in this regard. The aim of this study was to compare the serum level of IL-4 in patients with brucellosis and healthy controls. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this descriptive-analytical study for comparison of two groups, a total of 165 participants, including 83 patients with brucellosis and 82 non-infected people, were evaluated after matching of sex and age in Hamadan (northwest of Iran) in 2017 and the serum level of IL-4 was compared by ELISA method. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS software version 21 at 95% significant level.
resultsMean of age in the case and control groups were 50.25 ± 16.01 and 43.26 ± 15.6 years, respectively. The serum levels of IL-4 in the case and control groups were 1.42 ± 0.51 pg/mL and 1.31 ± 1.02 pg/mL, respectively. Based on the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, the IL-4 level was significantly higher in the case group, compared with the control (P < .001), but no statistically significant relationship was found between serum levels of IL-4 with age, sex, and serologic titers of Wright and 2ME.
conclusionIn patients with brucellosis, the level of IL-4 increases independently of the duration and severity of the disease, which indicates the role of this cytokine of immune system in this infectious disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.