Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100312›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2020

Time of day differences in neural reward responsiveness in children.

Aliona Tsypes, Brandon E Gibb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Maternal criticism and children's neural responses to reward and loss.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aliona TsypesDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5424-069X
Brandon E GibbDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-067X

Funding

Supplement to MH098060, “Children’s Attentional Biases: A Key Component of Negative Valence Systems.”R01MH098060 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI GIBB, BRANDON E · 2012 to 2015
$3.1M
A fine-grained EEG/ERP examination of reward processing in suicide attemptersF31MH114319 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI TSYPES, ALIONA · 2017 to 2018
$64k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH114319NIMH NIH HHS MH098060NIMH NIH HHS MH114319NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Reward Positivity (∆RewP) event-related potential (ERP), generally quantified as the difference between neural responsiveness to monetary gains (RewP-Gain) and losses (RewP-Loss) is commonly used as an index of neural reward responsiveness. Despite the popularity of this ERP component in studies of reward processing, knowledge about the role of state-related influences on the ∆RewP is limited. The present study examined whether ∆RewP amplitudes may differ based on when during the day they are assessed and whether age or sex would moderate this link. Participants were 188 children between the ages of 7 and 11 (47.3% female) without a lifetime history of a major depressive disorder or any anxiety disorder recruited from the community. Children completed the Doors task during which continuous electroencephalography was recorded to isolate the ∆RewP. To better isolate this ERP component from other temporally or spatially overlapping ERPs, we used temporospatial principal component analysis. We found that time of day (ToD) differences in the ∆RewP amplitude varied based on children's age. Specifically, older, compared to younger, children exhibited stronger responses to gains versus losses between 11:15 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. and after around 5:15 p.m. Further, these age-related differences appeared to be driven specifically by older children's reduced neural responsiveness to losses. The findings have methodological implications by highlighting the importance of accounting for the ToD at which ∆RewP-focused study sessions are conducted as well as for demographic characteristics of the participants, such as their age.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyRewardAge FactorsChildChild DevelopmentEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorschildrenERPreward positivityrewardstime of day

Identifiers

PMID32100312
PMCPMC10882954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.