Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100264›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

Comparison of the 1-year postoperative results of phacoemulsification-trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification-ExPRESS miniature shunt combined surgeries.

Kemal Turgay Özbilen, Şerife Bayraktar, Emre Altınkurt, Mehmet Cemil Yılmazlı, Muhammed Talha Sadık, Ali Üstüner

Abstract readClinical StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kemal Turgay ÖzbilenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey. turgay.ozbilen@istanbul.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-3803
Şerife BayraktarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emre AltınkurtDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Cemil YılmazlıGlaucoma Department, Istanbul Eye Hospital, Bahcelievler, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhammed Talha SadıkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali ÜstünerGlaucoma Department, Istanbul Eye Hospital, Bahcelievler, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TRIstanbul Eye Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the 1-year postoperative phacoemulsification-trabeculectomy (P-Trab) and phacoemulsification-ExPRESS MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective, comparative clinical study investigated 41 eyes of 41 patients diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma and cataract. Of these, 21 eyes underwent P-Trab surgery and 20 eyes underwent P-ExPRESS surgery. The 1-year follow-up results, including intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), medications, and complications, were reviewed and compared. A 5 ≤ IOP ≤ 18 mmHg or 30% reduction from baseline was defined as Qualified Success (QS-1), and target IOP without medication was defined as Complete Success (CS-1). A 5 ≤ IOP ≤ 15 mmHg or 40% reduction from baseline was defined as Qualified Success (QS-2), and target IOP without medication was defined as Complete Success (CS-2).

resultsThe mean follow-up time was 16 months (12-26 months). Results after the twelfth month for P-Trab versus P-ExPRESS are: CS-1: 42.8% versus 60.0% (P = 0.354); QS-1: 86.7% versus 95% (P = 0.606); CS-2:33.3% versus 40% (P = 0.751); QS-2: 66.6% versus 75% (P = 0.733). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was not statistically significant between two groups for both QS-1, CS-1 and QS-2, CS-2 (P = 0.329 vs P = 0.365, P = 0.765 vs P = 0.789, respectively). Pre-op mean IOP was: 33.19 ± 8.7 versus 34.55 ± 11.3 mmHg; post-op mean IOP was: 15.19 ± 3.07 versus 15.30 ± 3.32 mmHg (P = 0.913); pre-op mean VA was: 1.17 ± 1.04 versus 1.15 ± 1.07 logMAR; and post-op mean VA was: 0.61 ± 0.80 versus 0.66 ± 0.99 logMAR (P = 0.869). The pre-op mean number of antiglaucomatous medications was 3.76 ± 0.53 versus 3.30 ± 1.45, and the post-op results were 1.52 ± 1.53 versus 0.85 ± 1.26 (P = 0.135). Comparing the pre-op and post-op values, both types of surgeries were equally effective (P = 0.00). Surgical failure was 14.2% (3/21) versus 5% (1/20), and the incidence ratios of significant complications were: 47% (10/21) versus 10% (2/20) and P-Trab versus P-ExPRESS, respectively (P = 0.015).

conclusionThe 1-year postoperative results suggest that P-ExPRESS is as effective as P-Trab, with fewer complications.

Indexed as

StentsAgedCataractFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMalePhacoemulsificationPostoperative PeriodProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesScleraTime FactorsTrabeculectomyAqueous humor shuntsGlaucoma drainage implantsIntraocularLens implantationOpen-angle glaucomaPhacoemulsificationTrabeculectomy

Identifiers

PMID32100264
OpenAlexW3007136425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.