ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020
Quantitative analysis of eco-economic benefits of reclaimed water for controlling urban dust.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dust mitigation by the application of treated sewage effluent (TSE) in Iran.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the acceleration of urbanization and industrialization, urban air pollution, especially dust pollution, has become a global problem. The traditional method to control dust problem is to spray roads with tap water. However, this method will inevitably lead to a huge waste of water resources. Using reclaimed water instead of tap water for dust control can not only achieve the same effect of reducing dust and haze, but also save water resources. In addition, the saved tap water can be used for production and life, thereby obtaining additional benefits. In order to quantify the eco-economic benefits of sprinkling water for dust control, a quantitative method was proposed based on the emergy theory of ecological economics. It was used to calculate the cost of different water resources, the cooling and humidifying benefit, the dust control and haze reduction benefit, and the other use benefit. Taking the 2017 data of Zhengzhou as an example, the results indicated that the cost of using reclaimed water to control dust was reduced by 54%. The total benefit of using reclaimed water was about 1.30-1.80 times that of using tap water, and the net benefit was 4.65-7.17 times. Therefore, the use of reclaimed water instead of tap water for road dust control has advantages of low cost and high eco-economic benefits. The method proposed in this paper can provide quantitative basis for the popularization of using reclaimed water to dust control in cities with serious air pollution and water resource shortage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32100241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.