Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100213›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2021

What is the outcome of the open IPOM versus sublay technique in the treatment of larger incisional hernias?: A propensity score-matched comparison of 9091 patients from the Herniamed Registry.

F Köckerling, B Lammers, D Weyhe, W Reinpold, K Zarras, D Adolf, H Riediger, C M Krüger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Abdominal wall hernias part 2 : Operative treatment techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  11. [Management of late onset septic complications after IPOM implantation: case series from a hernia center].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Article
  12. Mesh fixation in IPOM with glue, a matter of solution?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F KöckerlingDepartment of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany. ferdinand.koeckerling@vivantes.de.
B LammersDepartment of Surgery I - Section Coloproctology and Hernia Surgery, Lukas Hospital, Preussenstr. 84, 41464, Neuss, Germany.
D WeyheUniversity Clinic for Visceral Surgery, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
W ReinpoldWilhelmsburger Hospital Groß-Sand, Groß-Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany.
K ZarrasMarien Hospital Düsseldorf, Rochusstraße 2, 40479, Düsseldorf, Germany.
D AdolfStatConsult GmbH, Halberstädter Strasse 40 a, 39112, Magdeburg, Germany.
H RiedigerVivantes Humboldt Hospital, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509, Berlin, Germany.
C M KrügerImmanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Seebad 82/83, 155562, Rüdersdorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn an Expert Consensus guided by systematic review, the panel agreed that for open elective incisional hernia repair, sublay mesh location is preferred, but open intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) may be useful in certain settings. This analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry aimed to compare the outcomes of open IPOM and sublay technique.

methodsPropensity score matching of 9091 patients with elective incisional hernia repair and with defect width ≥ 4 cm was performed. The following matching variables were selected: age, gender, risk factors, ASA score, preoperative pain, defect size, and defect localization.

resultsFor the 1977 patients with open IPOM repair and 7114 patients with sublay repair, n = 1938 (98%) pairs were formed. No differences were seen between the two groups with regard to the intraoperative, postoperative and general complications, complication-related reoperations and recurrences. But significant disadvantages were identified for the open IPOM repair in respect of pain on exertion (17.1% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.007), pain at rest (10.4% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.040) and chronic pain requiring treatment (8.8% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001), in addition to rates of 3.8%, 1.1% and 1.1%, respectively, occurring in both matched patients. No relationship with tacker mesh fixation was identified. There are only very few reports in the literature with comparable findings.

conclusionCompared with sublay repair, open IPOM repair appears to pose a higher risk of chronic pain. This finding concords with the Expert Consensus recommending that incisional hernia should preferably be repaired using the sublay technique.

Indexed as

Chronic PainIncisional HerniaFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRegistriesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeChronic painIncisional herniaOpen IPOMPostoperative complicationsRecurrenceSublay

Identifiers

PMID32100213
PMCPMC7867529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.