Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100182›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

FDA review summary of patient-reported outcome results for ibrutinib in the treatment of chronic graft versus host disease.

Bellinda L King-Kallimanis, Tanya Wroblewski, Virginia Kwitkowski, R Angelo De Claro, Thomas Gwise, Vishal Bhatnagar, Ann T Farrell, Paul G Kluetz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bellinda L King-KallimanisOncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Building 22, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. belinda.kallimanis@fda.hhs.gov.
Tanya WroblewskiCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Virginia KwitkowskiCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
R Angelo De ClaroCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Thomas GwiseCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Vishal BhatnagarCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Ann T FarrellCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Paul G KluetzOncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Building 22, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOn August 2, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration approved ibrutinib (IMBRUVICA) for the treatment of patients with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) after the failure of one or more lines of systemic therapy. The approval was based on results from a single-arm, multicenter trial that enrolled patients with refractory cGVHD. This paper describes the FDA review of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data from Study PCYC-1129-CA and the decision to incorporate descriptive PRO data in the FDA label to support the primary clinician-reported outcome results.

methodsIn this trial, the Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale (LSS) was used to capture patient-reported symptom bother. The 42 patients who received treatment were included in the analysis and completed the PRO tool. Post hoc descriptive analyses were conducted to further understand the measurement properties of the LSS.

resultsThe analysis submitted to FDA reported that 18 patients had a ≥ 7-point improvement on the LSS overall summary score at any point during the assessment period. For 10 patients, the ≥ 7-point improvement was sustained for ≥ 2 consecutive PRO assessments. An assessment of the responder threshold suggested the threshold submitted to the FDA was reasonable and in line with clinical findings.

conclusionsOverall, study PCYC-1129-CA demonstrated favorable clinician-reported cGVHD efficacy results that were complemented by results from PRO data, supporting the FDA's positive benefit-risk assessment leading to regular approval. Limitations included the single-arm trial design, responder definition, and instrument shortcomings. These limitations were thoroughly explored through additional FDA post hoc analyses.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdenineAdultAgedFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdenineibrutinibPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesChronic graft versus host diseaseClinical trialsFDAPatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32100182
OpenAlexW3007948230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.