ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020
Design of an end-effector for robot-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsies.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haptic and Palpation Sensing for Robotic Surgery: Engineering Perspectives on Design and Integration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal CT-ultrasound image-guided robotic system for automated abdominal puncture.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Preliminary application of robot-assisted teleultrasound-guided interventional system.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- A Multifunctional Capsule-like Puncture Biopsy Robot for the Gastrointestinal System.Micromachines · 2025Article
- User-specified inverse kinematics taught in virtual reality reduce time and effort to hand-guide redundant surgical robots.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Study on Bionic Design and Tissue Manipulation of Breast Interventional Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterization of the Workspace and Limits of Operation of Laser Treatments for Vascular Lesions of the Lower Limbs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Towards Autonomous Robotic Biopsy-Design, Modeling and Control of a Robot for Needle Insertion of a Commercial Full Core Biopsy Instrument.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- In Situ Visualization for 3D Ultrasound-Guided Interventions with Augmented Reality Headset.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Time-aware deep neural networks for needle tip localization in 2D ultrasound.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Visualization modality for augmented reality guidance of in-depth tumour enucleation procedures.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
- Robotics in Interventional Radiology: Review of Current and Future Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe biopsy procedure is an important phase in breast cancer diagnosis. Accurate breast imaging and precise needle placement are crucial in lesion targeting. This paper presents an end-effector (EE) for robotic 3D ultrasound (US) breast acquisitions and US-guided breast biopsies. The EE mechanically guides the needle to a specified target within the US plane. The needle is controlled in all degrees of freedom (DOFs) except for the direction of insertion, which is controlled by the radiologist. It determines the correct needle depth and stops the needle accordingly.
methodIn the envisioned procedure, a robotic arm performs localization of the breast, 3D US volume acquisition and reconstruction, target identification and needle guidance. Therefore, the EE is equipped with a stereo camera setup, a picobeamer, US probe holder, a three-DOF needle guide and a needle stop. The design was realized by prototyping techniques. Experiments were performed to determine needle placement accuracy in-air. The EE was placed on a seven-DOF robotic manipulator to determine the biopsy accuracy on a cuboid phantom.
resultsNeedle placement accuracy was 0.3 ± 1.5 mm in and 0.1 ± 0.36 mm out of the US plane. Needle depth was regulated with an accuracy of 100 µm (maximum error 0.89 mm). The maximum holding force of the stop was approximately 6 N. The system reached a Euclidean distance error of 3.21 mm between the needle tip and the target and a normal distance of 3.03 mm between the needle trajectory and the target.
conclusionAn all in one solution was presented which, attached to a robotic arm, assists the radiologist in breast cancer imaging and biopsy. It has a high needle placement accuracy, yet the radiologist is in control like in the conventional procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.