Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100144›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Evaluating the clinical effectiveness and safety of various HER2-targeted regimens after prior taxane/trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, unresectable, or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Noman Paracha, Adriana Reyes, Véronique Diéras, Ian Krop, Xavier Pivot, Ander Urruticoechea

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. PretreatmentCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Noman ParachaF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland. noman.paracha@roche.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-4853
Adriana ReyesF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Véronique DiérasCentre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Ian KropDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Xavier PivotPaul Strauss Centre, Regional Institute of Cancer, Strasbourg, France.
Ander UrruticoecheaOnkologikoa Foundation, San Sebastián, Spain.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHCentre Eugène Marquis · FRHarvard University · USInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FROnkologikoa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the absence of head-to-head trial data, network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with other approved treatments for previously treated patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (BC).

methodsSystematic reviews were conducted of published controlled trials of treatments for unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive BC with early relapse (≤ 6 months) following adjuvant therapy or progression after trastuzumab (Tras) + taxane published from January 1998 to January 2018. Random-effects NMA was conducted for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety endpoints.

resultsThe NMA included regimens from seven randomized controlled trials: T-DM1 and combinations of Tras, capecitabine (Cap), lapatinib (Lap), neratinib, or pertuzumab (Per; unapproved). OS results favored T-DM1 over approved comparators: hazard ratio (HR) (95% credible interval [95% CrI]) vs Cap 0.68 (0.39, 1.10), LapCap 0.76 (0.51, 1.07), TrasCap 0.78 (0.44, 1.19). PFS trends favored T-DM1 over all other treatments: HR (95% CrI) vs Cap 0.38 (0.19, 0.74), LapCap 0.65 (0.40, 1.10), TrasCap 0.62 (0.34, 1.18); ORR with T-DM1 was more favorable than with all approved treatments. In surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis T-DM1 ranked highest for all efficacy outcomes. Discontinuation due to adverse events was less likely with T-DM1 than with all comparators except neratinib. In general, gastrointestinal side effects were less likely and elevated liver transaminases and thrombocytopenia more likely with T-DM1 than with comparators.

conclusionsThe efficacy and tolerability profiles of T-DM1 are generally favorable compared with other treatments for unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive BC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBridged-Ring CompoundsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyTaxoidsTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeBridged-Ring CompoundsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasestaxaneTaxoidsTrastuzumabCapecitabineLapatinibLocally advancedNeratinibPertuzumabTrastuzumab emtansine

Identifiers

PMID32100144
PMCPMC7103014
OpenAlexW3007580854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.