ArticleNeurosurgical review2021
Combination analysis on the impact of the initial vision and surgical time for the prognosis of indirect traumatic optic neuropathy after endoscopic transnasal optic canal decompression.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endoscopic Endonasal Optic Nerve Decompression for Traumatic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyPooled it
- Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors in traumatic optic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the endoscopic optic nerve decompression.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Endoscopic endonasal decompression for traumatic optic nerve injury: how I do it.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review of current studies.Neurosurgical review · 2022Review
- The outcome of surgical and non-surgical treatments for traumatic optic neuropathy: a comparative study of 685 cases.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Endoscopic trans-ethmosphenoid optic canal decompression is an optimal choice to save vision for indirect traumatic optic neuropathy.Acta ophthalmologica · 2022Article
- The retinal vasculature pathophysiological changes in vision recovery after treatment for indirect traumatic optic neuropathy patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Article
- Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To analyze the impact of the initial vision and surgical time for endoscopic transnasal/transethmosphenoid optic canal decompression (ETOCD) in the treatment of indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (TON). This retrospective case series analysis included 72 patients with indirect TON who underwent ETOCD from August 2017 to May 2019. Visual acuity (VA) was compared before and after surgery to estimate the improvement rate. The overall VA improvement rate of ETOCD was 54.2%. There were 83.3% and 33.3% improvement rate of patients with residual vision and blindness, respectively. VA was improved in 60.9% of patients treated within 3 days, 61.5% treated within 7 days, and 35.0% treated later than 7 days. Of the blindness patients, 50.0%, 37.5%, and 0.0% were treated within 3 days, 3-7 days, and later than 7 days, respectively. Of patients with residual vision, 85.7%, 92.3%, and 70.0% were treated within 3 days, 3-7 days, and later than 7 days, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between patients with residual vision and those with blindness (P < 0.01), as well as between patients who received ETOCD within 7 days and those who received ETOCD later than 7 days (P = 0.043). The improvement rate of blindness patients managed within 3 days (P = 0.008) and 3-7 days (P = 0.035) was significantly higher than that for patients managed beyond 7 days. Indirect TON patients can directly benefit from ETOCD, and patients with residual vision have better improvement rates. ETOCD should be performed as soon as possible to salvage the patient's VA, especially within the first 7 days. For blindness patients, it is necessary to carry out the surgery within 7 days with increased benefit seen before 3 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32100134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.