Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100112›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the colon: 2 case reports and a comprehensive review of the literature.

Serkan Karaisli, Erdinc Kamer, Nese Ekinci, Fevzi Cengiz, Ahmet Er, Mustafa Peskersoy

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung: a comprehensive narrative review of clinical and therapeutic insights.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Anus: A Case Report.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serkan KaraisliDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. skaraisli@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-0191
Erdinc KamerDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-5867
Nese EkinciDepartment of Pathology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-0619
Fevzi CengizDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-5568
Ahmet ErDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-563X
Mustafa PeskersoyDepartment of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7319-2686
Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT), which is also named as plasma cell granuloma (PCG) or inflammatory pseudotumour (IPT), is a rare tumour which rarely develops in the colorectal region. We aimed to review all reported cases to draw attention about this rare tumour.

methodsWe present two new cases of colonic IMT with no recurrence during the follow-up period. We also reviewed previously reported colorectal IMT/IPT/PCG patients to investigate demographics, diagnosis and treatment modalities.

resultsA total of 60 patients which including our 2 patients and 58 patients from 42 published articles were analysed. Male/female ratio was 34/26. Mean age was found to be 31.84 ± 22.26 years (9 months-82 years). Abdominal pain (56.7%) and fever (23.3%) were the most common complaints in the first admission. Fifty-nine (98.3%) out of 60 patients underwent surgery. During follow-up, 7 (14.3%) patients developed a local recurrence.

conclusionIMT may occur at any age. IMT is considered to be a borderline tumour with the potential for recurrence or distant metastasis. Complete resection of the tumour is recommended for treatment. Long-time follow-up is necessary due to recurrence potential of the tumour even many years after complete surgical resection.

trial registrationThe study follows the regulation of the Institutional Review Board for human research at Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital. Written informed consents were obtained from the patients who participated in this study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolColonic NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInflammationMaleMiddle AgedMyofibroblastsColonColorectalInflammatory myofibroblastic tumourInflammatory pseudotumourPlasma cell granuloma

Identifiers

PMID32100112
OpenAlexW3007883056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.