Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32100091›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.

Joël Greffier, Aymeric Hamard, Fabricio Pereira, Corinne Barrau, Hugo Pasquier, Jean Paul Beregi, Julien Frandon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05651360 (Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Low Dose CT for the Detection of Acute Abdominal Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 175 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05651360 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Low Dose CT for the Detection of Acute Abdominal Conditions

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled246ConditionsAbdominal Pain, Acute Pain, Acute Cholecystitis, Acute AppendicitisArmslow-dose CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joël GreffierDepartment of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France. joel.greffier@chu-nimes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-5129
Aymeric HamardDepartment of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Fabricio PereiraDepartment of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Corinne BarrauDepartment of Medical Physics, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Hugo PasquierGE Healthcare, Buc, France.
Jean Paul BeregiDepartment of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Julien FrandonDepartment of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRGeneral Electric (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact on image quality and dose reduction of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm.

methodsData acquisitions were performed at seven dose levels (CTDI

resultsNPS peaks were higher with AV50 than with all DLIR levels and only higher with DLIR-H than with AV100. The average NPS spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR than with IR. For all DLIR levels, TTF

conclusionsNew DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture. Images obtained with DLIR seem to indicate a greater potential for dose optimization than those with hybrid IR. KEY POINTS: • This study assessed the impact on image quality and radiation dose of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm as compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The new DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without perceived alteration of the texture, commonly reported with IR. • As compared with IR, DLIR seems to open further possibility of dose optimization.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningPhantoms, ImagingHumansRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningImage enhancementImage reconstructionMultidetector computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID32100091
OpenAlexW3007407399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.