ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020
[Evidence of compression therapy with special consideration of medical adaptive compression systems].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Wounds caused by vasculitis-Current classification, diagnostics and treatment].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2023Review
- [Classification and nomenclature of current materials for compression therapy].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Diagnosis of leg edema].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Modern management of chronic wounds].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Article
- [Conservative treatment of varicose veins].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Article
- [Surgical treatment for chronic leg ulcer].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For several decades, compression therapy, which is associated with few side effects, has been a basis for the conservative treatment of patients with phlebological and lymphological diseases. For the practical implementation of compression therapy, many different materials are available, some with system-specific advantages and disadvantages. Medical adaptive compression systems (MAK) are still a relatively new treatment option in Germany. Apart from the very good practical experience in clinical everyday life, the compilation of the scientific evidence of compression therapy also shows that the scientific data situation is significantly better than for many other medical areas, especially for the treatment of patients with venous diseases. It is important to note that compression therapy must reliably guarantee adequate compression pressure. If these conditions are met, it can be assumed on the basis of the currently available data that the clinical effectiveness of the different compression systems is comparably good. These aspects have now also been well tested for MAK, so that these analogies can be drawn. Therapists today can therefore choose between different, very effective therapy options and take individual factors, patient wishes and economic aspects into account when making their selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.