Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099868›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2020

Psychiatric electronic health records privacy in Jordan: A policy brief.

Ahmed R Karajeh, Majd T Mrayyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed R KarajehDepartment of Community and Mental Health Nursing, The Hashemite University, Jordan.
Majd T MrayyanDepartment of Community and Mental Health Nursing, The Hashemite University, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric health records are highly sensitive data which requires special policy to maintain its privacy, without affecting data accessibility. The current authors reviewed social, ethical and legal underpinnings for psychiatric electronic health records (EHR), and suggests a policy to maintain privacy and confidentiality of the psychiatric data, without affecting data accessibility. The purpose of this policy brief is to discuss and provide alternatives regarding psychiatric electronic health records privacy and information access. The current policy applied in Jordan still immature to ensure high levels of reliability, as the psychiatric data is openly accessed to the non-specialized personnel. Sensitive personal data policy is recommended in this paper with developing overriding mechanisms to counteract obstacles to data accessibility.

Indexed as

Access to informationElectronic health recordsHealth informaticsJordanPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID32099868
PMCPMC7031133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.