Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099840›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of reproductive medicine2020

Gender-Informed Family Planning Perceptions and Decision-Making in Rural Chiapas, Mexico: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Samantha Truong, Jimena Villar de Onis, Alexa Lindley, Rodrigo Bazúa, Andrea Reyes, Mariana Montaño, Leanne Marcotrigiano, Rose L Molina

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of reproductive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Perceived Barriers of Using Modern Family Planning Methods among Women in Jordan: A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Samantha TruongHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., 02115 Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8233-6189
Jimena Villar de OnisGeneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 150 Route de Ferney, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Alexa LindleyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 356390, 98195 Seattle, WA, USA.
Rodrigo BazúaCompañeros En Salud, Calle Primera Poniente Sur #25, 30370 Ángel Albino Corzo, Chiapas, Mexico.
Andrea ReyesPrograma Multicéntrico de Residencias Médicas, Tec Salud, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Av Morones Prieto No. 3000, Colonia Los Doctores, CP 64710 Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Mariana MontañoCompañeros En Salud, Calle Primera Poniente Sur #25, 30370 Ángel Albino Corzo, Chiapas, Mexico.
Leanne MarcotrigianoLa Clínica de la Raza, P.O. Box 22210, 94623 Oakland, CA, USA.
Rose L MolinaHarvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., 02115 Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-7960
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USFoundation for laboratory medicine · CHHarvard University · USLa Clinica de La Raza · USTecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to other Mexican states, Chiapas possessed the lowest rate of contraception use among women 15-49 years old (44.6%) in 2018. This convergent mixed-methods study assessed family planning use, perceptions, and decision-making processes among women and men in rural communities where Compañeros En Salud (CES) works in Chiapas, Mexico. We conducted surveys of reproductive-aged women and semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women, men, and physicians completing their social-service year in CES communities from 2016 to 2017. Of the 625 survey respondents, 368 (58.9%) reported using contraception. The most common methods were female sterilization (27.7%), bimonthly injection (10.9%), and the implant (10.9%). Interviews were completed with 27 women, 24 men, and 5 physicians and analyzed through an inductive approach. Common reasons for contraception use were preventing pregnancy, lack of resources for additional children, and birth spacing. Adverse effects, influence of male partners, and perceived lack of need emerged as reasons for non-use. Male partners often made the final decision about contraceptive use, while women often chose what method. Physicians reported adverse effects, misconceptions about methods, and lack of women's autonomy as barriers to contraception use. Given misconceptions about contraception methods and the dominant role of men in contraception decision-making, our study illustrates the importance of effective counseling and equitable gender dynamics for family planning programming in rural Chiapas.

Identifiers

PMID32099840
PMCPMC7014558
OpenAlexW3004337369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.