Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099593›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Technological advances and computational approaches for alternative splicing analysis in single cells.

Wei Xiong Wen, Adam J Mead, Supat Thongjuea

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Single-Cell Analysis of the Transcriptome and Epigenome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei Xiong WenMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Adam J MeadMRC Molecular Haematology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
Supat ThongjueaMRC WIMM Centre for Computational Biology, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L006340/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative splicing of RNAs generates isoform diversity, resulting in different proteins that are necessary for maintaining cellular function and identity. The discovery of alternative splicing has been revolutionized by next-generation transcriptomic sequencing mainly using bulk RNA-sequencing, which has unravelled RNA splicing and mis-splicing of normal cells under steady-state and stress conditions. Single-cell RNA-sequencing studies have focused on gene-level expression analysis and revealed gene expression signatures distinguishable between different cellular types. Single-cell alternative splicing is an emerging area of research with the promise to reveal transcriptomic dynamics invisible to bulk- and gene-level analysis. In this review, we will discuss the technological advances for single-cell alternative splicing analysis, computational strategies for isoform detection and quantitation in single cells, and current applications of single-cell alternative splicing analysis and its potential future contributions to personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Alternative splicingIsoformNext-generation sequencingPercent spliced-inSingle-cell transcriptome analysis

Identifiers

PMID32099593
PMCPMC7033300
OpenAlexW3005435954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.