Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099452›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2020

Continuous Wound Infiltration of Local Anesthetics in Postoperative Pain Management: Safety, Efficacy and Current Perspectives.

Giuseppe Paladini, Stefano Di Carlo, Giuseppe Musella, Emiliano Petrucci, Paolo Scimia, Andrea Ambrosoli, Vincenza Cofini, Pierfrancesco Fusco

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe PaladiniDepartment of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Therapy, Filippo Del Ponte Women and Children's Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4387-4165
Stefano Di CarloDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-8706
Giuseppe MusellaDepartment of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Therapy, Filippo Del Ponte Women and Children's Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-8477
Emiliano PetrucciDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Salvatore Academic Hospital of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-7891
Paolo ScimiaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASUR Marche AV5, San Benedetto Del Tronto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-8651
Andrea AmbrosoliDepartment of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Therapy, Filippo Del Ponte Women and Children's Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Vincenza CofiniDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1107-418X
Pierfrancesco FuscoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Salvatore Academic Hospital of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5342-3654
Ospedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese · ITSan Salvatore Hospital · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local infiltration and continuous infusion of surgical wound with anesthetics are parts of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain control. The techniques, given the simplicity of execution that does not increase the timing of the intervention and does not require additional technical skills, are applied in several kinds of surgeries. The continuous wound infiltration can be used for days and a variety of continuous delivery methods can be chosen, including patient-controlled analgesia, continuous infusion or intermittent bolus. The purpose of this narrative review is to analyze the literature, in particular by researching the safety, efficacy and current perspectives of continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management in different surgical settings. We have identified 203 articles and 95 of these have been taken into consideration: 17 for the lower limb surgery; 7 for the upper limb surgery, 51 for the laparotomy/laparoscopic surgery of the abdominopelvic area, 13 studies regarding breast surgery and 7 for cardiothoracic surgery. The analysis of these studies reveals that the technique has a variable effectiveness based on the type of structure involved: it is better in structures rich in subcutaneous and connective tissue, while the effectiveness is limited in anatomic districts with a greater variability of innervation. However, regardless the heterogeneity of results, a general reduction in pain intensity and in opioid consumption has been observed with continuous wound infiltration: it is an excellent analgesic technique that can be included in the multimodal treatment of postoperative pain or represents a valid alternative when other options are contraindicated.

Indexed as

continuous wound infiltrationlocal anestheticspostoperative analgesiapostoperative pain management

Identifiers

PMID32099452
PMCPMC6999584
OpenAlexW3003226602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.