Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32099338›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020

Exploring Patient's Perspectives and Experiences After Start with Inhalation Maintenance Therapy: A Qualitative Theory-Based Study.

Esther Kuipers, Michel Wensing, Peter Agm De Smet, Martina Teichert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther KuipersRadboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-1278
Michel WensingRadboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-8137
Peter Agm De SmetRadboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-6547
Martina TeichertLeiden University Medical Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-3325
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of obstructive lung disease with inhalation therapy needs changes in patient behavior. Shortly after the start with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) maintenance therapy, patients might be in need of additional pharmaceutical care, tailored to their individual needs. This study aimed to provide insight into patient behavior, goals and perceptions regarding their medical treatment at start with ICS therapy, by telephone interviews with ICS starters. Besides, this study investigated pharmacists' and patients' experiences with these interviews and opinions on the utility of this type of consultation for daily practice.

methodsSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted by pharmacists with adult patients 2-3 weeks after starting ICS. The Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) was used for data analysis and coding. Afterward, the patients and pharmacists were questioned about their experiences with the interview.

resultsFive pharmacists conducted interviews with 23 ICS starters. Except the domains "environmental context and resources", "optimism", and "reinforcement", the remaining 11 domains in the TDF were addressed in the interviews. The majority of patients defined personal goals, which mainly addressed disease or symptom control (clinical goals). Some patients showed a lack of knowledge regarding the clinical indication or therapy duration. Views on beneficial medication effects differed between patients. Some patients specifically mentioned concerns or anxiety about side effects. The interviewees described different perceptions on the necessity of a personalized routine for regular medication use. Patients and pharmacists both felt positive about an added value of these interviews for daily practice.

conclusionPatient interviews shortly after start with ICS therapy revealed various perceptions and beliefs that might influence medication use and achievement of individual treatment goals. The patients appreciated the opportunity to ask questions and share their perspectives and needs with their pharmacist, and the pharmacists experienced that the interviews had added value.

Indexed as

asthmaconsultationCOPDinhalation therapypatient perspectivepharmaceutical carepharmacy practice research

Identifiers

PMID32099338
PMCPMC6996208
OpenAlexW3003414414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.