Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2020
Comparative Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence and Safety Study of Two Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Injections in Healthy Chinese Subjects.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of L-citrulline injection on testicular hemodynamics and semen quality in aged bucks.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Effect of repeated injection of human chorionic gonadotropin on semen quality, testicular hemodynamics and hormonal profile of senile camel.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence and safety profile of the recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) injection formulation LZM003 (test drug) comparing with that of Ovidrel
methodsThis is a randomized, single-blind, single-dose, two-arm and two-period crossover Phase I study. Subjects were randomized evenly to a single dose of LZM003 or reference drug injected subcutaneously, with a 10-day or longer between-treatment washout period. PK parameters, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The primary PK endpoints were area under the curve (AUC) of the concentration-time curve from zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC
resultsForty-eight subjects (24 males and 24 females) were enrolled and one subject withdrew for personal reasons. Mean values of primary PK parameters were similar (p > 0.05) between LZM003 and the reference drug. The 90% CIs for primary PK endpoints' GMR of LZM003 to reference drug ranged between 0.9144 and 1.1845, which were within bioequivalence margins of 80-125%. Incidence of AEs was similar (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Neither LZM003 nor reference drug produced anti-drug antibody (ADA) in healthy subjects.
conclusionLZM003 and reference drug were bioequivalent. The PK and safety assessments were similar (p > 0.05) between the two formulations in healthy Chinese subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IIR-16010158 (http://www.chictr.org.cn). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: December 15, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.